These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17141981)

  • 1. Temporal generalization accounts for response resurgence in the peak procedure.
    Sanabria F; Killeen PR
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):126-41. PubMed ID: 17141981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of intruded events on peak time: the role of reinforcement history during the intruded event.
    Aum S; Brown BL; Hemmes NS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 17157998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acquisition versus steady state in the time-left experiment.
    Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):172-87. PubMed ID: 16343806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of temporal generalization in a temporal discrimination task.
    Russell R; Kirkpatrick K
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 16979846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of timing and classical conditioning.
    Holder MD; Roberts S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Apr; 11(2):172-93. PubMed ID: 4009120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When to respond? And how much? Temporal control and response output on mixed-fixed-interval schedules with unequally probable components.
    Whitaker S; Lowe CF; Wearden JH
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 17628349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Timescale invariance and Weber's law in choice.
    Jozefowiez J; Cerutti DT; Staddon JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 16834491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time-sharing in pigeons: Independent effects of gap duration, position and discriminability from the timed signal.
    Buhusi CV; Paskalis JP; Cerutti DT
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):116-25. PubMed ID: 16414210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oscillations following periodic reinforcement.
    Monteiro T; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 18992793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timing in pigeons: effects of the similarity between intertrial interval and gap in a timing signal.
    Kaiser DH; Zentall TR; Neiman E
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 12395499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The failure of Weber's law in time perception and production.
    Bizo LA; Chu JY; Sanabria F; Killeen PR
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):201-10. PubMed ID: 16386378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bisection of temporal intervals by pigeons.
    Platt JR; Davis ER
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Apr; 9(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 6842135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preference as a function of absolute response durations.
    Shimp CP; Sabulsky SL; Childers LJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jul; 16(3):288-97. PubMed ID: 2398340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Categorical scaling of time: implications for clock-counter models.
    Fetterman JG; Killeen PR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1995 Jan; 21(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 7844506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "The stone which the builders rejected...": Delay of reinforcement and response rate on fixed-interval and related schedules.
    Wearden JH; Lejeune H
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):77-87. PubMed ID: 16307848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential resurgence and response elimination.
    Doughty AH; da Silva SP; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 17395402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fewer peak trials per session facilitate acquisition of peak responding despite elimination of response rate differences.
    Kaiser DH
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 18793706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous temporal processing.
    Meck WH; Church RM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Jan; 10(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 6707581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences between simultaneous and blocked training detected by a transfer test.
    Caetano MS; Guilhardi P; Church RM
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 17403584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.