173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17142101)
1. Air sampling of Aspergillus fumigatus and other thermotolerant fungi: comparative performance of the Sartorius MD8 airport and the Merck MAS-100 portable bioaerosol sampler.
Engelhart S; Glasmacher A; Simon A; Exner M
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 Dec; 210(6):733-739. PubMed ID: 17142101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term versus long-term filter cassette sampling for viable fungi in indoor air: comparative performance of the Sartorius MD8 and the GSP sampler.
Engelhart S; Exner M
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2002 Oct; 205(6):443-51. PubMed ID: 12455266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Results of Studies of Air Pollution Fungi Using the SAS Super 100, MAS 100, and Air IDEAL.
Łukaszuk C; Krajewska-Kułak E; Guzowski A; Kułak W; Kraszyńska B
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Jul; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 28726722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of three impactor samplers for measuring airborne bacteria and fungi concentrations.
Méheust D; Gangneux JP; Cann PL
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 23799861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative efficiencies of two air sampling methods and three culture conditions for the assessment of airborne culturable fungi in a poultry farmhouse in France.
Nieguitsila A; Arné P; Durand B; Deville M; Benoît-Valiergue H; Chermette R; Cottenot-Latouche S; Guillot J
Environ Res; 2011 Feb; 111(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 21215966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of sampling duration on recovery of culturable fungi using the Andersen N6 and RCS bioaerosol samplers.
Saldanha R; Manno M; Saleh M; Ewaze JO; Scott JA
Indoor Air; 2008 Dec; 18(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 18761682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative performance of impactor air samplers for quantification of fungal contamination.
Nesa D; Lortholary J; Bouakline A; Bordes M; Chandenier J; Derouin F; Gangneux JP
J Hosp Infect; 2001 Feb; 47(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 11170780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative performance of two air samplers for monitoring airborne fungal propagules.
Távora LG; Gambale W; Heins-Vaccari EM; Arriagada GL; Lacaz CS; Santos CR; Levin AS
Braz J Med Biol Res; 2003 May; 36(5):613-6. PubMed ID: 12715080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.
Yao M; Mainelis G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jul; 4(7):514-24. PubMed ID: 17538812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variability of airborne microflora in a hospital ward within a period of one year.
Augustowska M; Dutkiewicz J
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2006; 13(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 16841880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Airborne viable, non-viable, and allergenic fungi in a rural agricultural area of India: a 2-year study at five outdoor sampling stations.
Adhikari A; Sen MM; Gupta-Bhattacharya S; Chanda S
Sci Total Environ; 2004 Jun; 326(1-3):123-41. PubMed ID: 15142771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of portable microbial samplers for estimating inhalation exposure to viable biological agents.
Yao M; Mainelis G
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 16912697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Culturable airborne fungi in outdoor environments in Beijing, China.
Fang Z; Ouyang Z; Hu L; Wang X; Zheng H; Lin X
Sci Total Environ; 2005 Nov; 350(1-3):47-58. PubMed ID: 16227072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Total airborne mold particle sampling: evaluation of sample collection, preparation and counting procedures, and collection devices.
Godish D; Godish T
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb; 5(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 18085480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Applicability of a modified MCE filter method with Button Inhalable Sampler for monitoring personal bioaerosol inhalation exposure.
Xu Z; Xu H; Yao M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 May; 20(5):2963-72. PubMed ID: 23054771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.
Lee KS; Bartlett KH; Brauer M; Stephens GM; Black WA; Teschke K
Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 15330796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of three portable samplers for monitoring airborne fungi.
Mehta SK; Mishra SK; Pierson DL
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 May; 62(5):1835-8. PubMed ID: 11536729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of environmental factors on airborne fungi in houses of Santa Fe City, Argentina.
Basilico Mde L; Chiericatti C; Aringoli EE; Althaus RL; Basilico JC
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 376(1-3):143-50. PubMed ID: 17320936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A year-round aeromycological study in Zagreb area, Croatia.
Segvić Klarić M; Pepeljnjak S
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2006; 13(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16841873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
