214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17142816)
1. Bioinformatics in the human interactome project.
Ideker T; Valencia A
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):2973-4. PubMed ID: 17142816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraproteomic networks: new forays into predicting interaction partners.
Aravind L; Iyer LM
Genome Res; 2002 Aug; 12(8):1156-8. PubMed ID: 12176922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bioinformatics, multiscale modeling and the IUPS Physiome Project.
Hunter PJ; Crampin EJ; Nielsen PM
Brief Bioinform; 2008 Jul; 9(4):333-43. PubMed ID: 18477639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toward the complete interactome.
Friedel CC; Zimmer R
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Jun; 24(6):614-5; author reply 615. PubMed ID: 16763580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Current progress in computational metabolomics.
Wishart DS
Brief Bioinform; 2007 Sep; 8(5):279-93. PubMed ID: 17626065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current trends in computational inference from mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
Webb-Robertson BJ; Cannon WR
Brief Bioinform; 2007 Sep; 8(5):304-17. PubMed ID: 17584764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Cartographers toolbox: building bigger and better human protein interaction networks.
Sanderson CM
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic; 2009 Jan; 8(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19282470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protein interaction mapping for target validation: the need for an integrated combinatory process involving complementary approaches.
Strosberg AD
Curr Opin Mol Ther; 2002 Dec; 4(6):594-600. PubMed ID: 12596362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards multidimensional genome annotation.
Reed JL; Famili I; Thiele I; Palsson BO
Nat Rev Genet; 2006 Feb; 7(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 16418748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Key challenges in proteomics and proteoinformatics. Progress in proteins.
Hamady M; Cheung TH; Resing K; Cios KJ; Knight R
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2005; 24(3):34-40. PubMed ID: 15971839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Charting plant interactomes: possibilities and challenges.
Morsy M; Gouthu S; Orchard S; Thorneycroft D; Harper JF; Mittler R; Cushman JC
Trends Plant Sci; 2008 Apr; 13(4):183-91. PubMed ID: 18329319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current trends in the bioinformatic sequence analysis of metabolic pathways in prokaryotes.
Brilli M; Fani R; Liò P
Brief Bioinform; 2008 Jan; 9(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 18024984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The end of the beginning for genomic medicine.
Bailey D; Zanders E; Dean P
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):207-9. PubMed ID: 11231543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Interaction between intrinsically disordered proteins frequently occurs in a human protein-protein interaction network.
Shimizu K; Toh H
J Mol Biol; 2009 Oct; 392(5):1253-65. PubMed ID: 19660471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifying components of complexes.
Goffard N; Weiller G
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 453():257-65. PubMed ID: 18712308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Interactome' analysis: a step forward in proteomics research.
Babu S
Biotechnol J; 2010 Apr; 5(4):357-8. PubMed ID: 20349458
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. US NHGRI launches chemical attack on drug development gap.
Garber K
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1253-4. PubMed ID: 14595338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Companies of all sizes are prospecting for proteins.
Gavaghan H
Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6778):684-6. PubMed ID: 10766256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Docking motif-guided mapping of the interactome of protein phosphatase-1.
Hendrickx A; Beullens M; Ceulemans H; Den Abt T; Van Eynde A; Nicolaescu E; Lesage B; Bollen M
Chem Biol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 19389623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structural genomics: bioinformatics in the driver's seat.
Gaasterland T
Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Jul; 16(7):625-7. PubMed ID: 9661193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
