BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17143113)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance lymphography.
    Bellin MF; Roy C
    Curr Opin Urol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 17143113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pilot study of lymphotrophic nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging technique in early stage testicular cancer: a new method for noninvasive lymph node evaluation.
    Harisinghani MG; Saksena M; Ross RW; Tabatabaei S; Dahl D; McDougal S; Weissleder R
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):1066-71. PubMed ID: 16286125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-sectional imaging of nodal metastases in the abdomen and pelvis.
    Koh DM; Hughes M; Husband JE
    Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(6):632-43. PubMed ID: 16897278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Value of computer tomography and lymphography for staging of malignant testicular tumors].
    Freitag J; Müller GW; Buhtz C; Freitag G; Buhtz P
    Z Urol Nephrol; 1985 Feb; 78(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 3993244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advanced imaging technologies for mapping cadaveric lymphatic anatomy: magnetic resonance and computed tomography lymphangiography.
    Pan WR; Rozen WM; Stretch J; Thierry B; Ashton MW; Corlett RJ
    Lymphology; 2008 Sep; 41(3):126-30. PubMed ID: 19013880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Diagnostic imaging of the subdiaphragmatic lymphatic system in malignant lymphoma: confusion of abundance?].
    Kuhn E; Dérczy K; Grexa E; Györe C; Hertelendy A; Palkó A
    Orv Hetil; 1992 Mar; 133(11):649-52. PubMed ID: 1553222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lymphadenectomy in minimally invasive urologic oncology.
    Vanni AJ; Moinzadeh A
    Curr Opin Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 18303537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging can be used in place of positron emission tomography for N staging of non-small cell lung cancer with fewer false-positive results.
    Nomori H; Mori T; Ikeda K; Kawanaka K; Shiraishi S; Katahira K; Yamashita Y
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):816-22. PubMed ID: 18374761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Invited commentary. MR evaluation of normal retroperitoneal and pelvic lymph nodes.
    Spencer JA
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Mar; 57(3):201-2; discussion 203-4. PubMed ID: 11952314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lymph node staging.
    Vogl T; Bisdas S
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Aug; 18(4):303-16. PubMed ID: 17893595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: a review.
    Buscarini M; Josephson DY; Stein JP
    Urol Int; 2007; 79(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 17940349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation using thin-section T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
    Koh DM; Chau I; Tait D; Wotherspoon A; Cunningham D; Brown G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jun; 71(2):456-61. PubMed ID: 18164860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. (Paediatric) magnetic resonance urography: just fancy images or a new important diagnostic tool?
    Riccabona M
    Curr Opin Urol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 17143111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. State-of-the-art cross-sectional imaging in bladder cancer.
    Setty BN; Holalkere NS; Sahani DV; Uppot RN; Harisinghani M; Blake MA
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2007; 36(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 17331839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional imaging in penile cancer: PET/computed tomography, MRI, and sentinel lymph node biopsy.
    Mueller-Lisse UG; Scher B; Scherr MK; Seitz M
    Curr Opin Urol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 18090498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Akasu T; Iinuma G; Takawa M; Yamamoto S; Muramatsu Y; Moriyama N
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):2787-94. PubMed ID: 19618244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Newer imaging modalities to assist with target localization in the radiation treatment of prostate cancer and possible lymph node metastases.
    John SS; Zietman AL; Shipley WU; Harisinghani MG
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S43-7. PubMed ID: 18406936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The management of neck metastases in nasopharyngeal cancer.
    Wei WI; Mok VW
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Apr; 15(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 17413410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.
    Steven K; Poulsen AL
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. PubMed ID: 17698113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Location of involved mesorectal and extramesorectal lymph nodes in patients with primary rectal cancer: preoperative assessment with MR imaging.
    Engelen SM; Beets-Tan RG; Lahaye MJ; Kessels AG; Beets GL
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Jul; 34(7):776-81. PubMed ID: 18039560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.