These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17144265)

  • 1. Simulation analysis of ASM/Takács models in the BSM1 configuration.
    Sorour MT; Bahgat LM
    Environ Technol; 2006 Oct; 27(10):1163-70. PubMed ID: 17144265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calibration and simulation of two large wastewater treatment plants operated for nutrient removal.
    Ferrer J; Morenilla JJ; Bouzas A; García-Usach F
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):87-94. PubMed ID: 15536994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A systematic approach for model verification: application on seven published activated sludge models.
    Hauduc H; Rieger L; Takács I; Héduit A; Vanrolleghem PA; Gillot S
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):825-39. PubMed ID: 20182061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Landfill leachate characterization for simulation of biological treatment with Activated Sludge Model No. 1 and Activated Sludge Model No. 3.
    Galleguillos M; Vasel JL
    Environ Technol; 2011; 32(11-12):1259-67. PubMed ID: 21970168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design strategy for a simultaneous nitrification/denitrification of a slaughterhouse wastewater in a Sequencing Batch Reactor: ASM2d modeling and verification.
    Filali-Meknassi Y; Auriol M; Tyagi RD; Comeau Y; Surampalli RY
    Environ Technol; 2005 Oct; 26(10):1081-100. PubMed ID: 16342532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulation study supporting wastewater treatment plant upgrading.
    Hvala N; Vrecko D; Burica O; Strazar M; Levstek M
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):325-32. PubMed ID: 12361028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lag phase, dynamic alpha factor and ammonium adsorption behaviour: introduction of special activated sludge characteristics in the ASM3 + EAWAG-BioP-model.
    Alex J; Holm NC; Rönner-Holm SG
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 19151495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model-based evaluation of nitrogen removal in a tannery wastewater treatment plant.
    Moussa MS; Rojas AR; Hooijmans CM; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):251-60. PubMed ID: 15537014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Including the effects of filamentous bulking sludge during the simulation of wastewater treatment plants using a risk assessment model.
    Flores-Alsina X; Comas J; Rodriguez-Roda I; Gernaey KV; Rosen C
    Water Res; 2009 Oct; 43(18):4527-38. PubMed ID: 19695661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in UCT-type MBR process.
    Lee H; Han J; Yun Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19494447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The EAWAG Bio-P module for activated sludge model No. 3.
    Siegrist H; Rieger L; Koch G; Kühni M; Gujer W
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(6):61-76. PubMed ID: 11989879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulation of wastewater treatment plant within integrated urban wastewater models.
    Heusch S; Kamradt B; Ostrowski M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(10):2645-52. PubMed ID: 20453339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of stoichiometric and kinetic coefficients of ASM3 under aerobic and anoxic conditions via respirometry.
    Avcioğlu E; Karahan-Gül O; Orhon D
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):185-94. PubMed ID: 14682586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new approach towards modelling of the carbon degradation cycle at two-stage activated sludge plants.
    Winkler S; Müller-Rechberger H; Nowak O; Svardal K; Wandl G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):19-27. PubMed ID: 11385846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced nitrogen removal in the combined activated sludge-biofilter system of the Southpest Wastewater Treatment Plant.
    Jobbágy A; Tardy GM; Literáthy B
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):1-8. PubMed ID: 15553452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design of nutrient removal activated sludge systems.
    Manga J; Ferrer J; Seco A; Garcia-Usach F
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):115-22. PubMed ID: 12906279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementation, study and calibration of a modified ASM2d for the simulation of SBR processes.
    Marsili Libelli S; Ratini P; Spagni A; Bortone G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(3):69-76. PubMed ID: 11381934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Model-based optimisation of the biological performance of a sidestream MBR.
    Nopens I; Sin G; Jiang T; d'Antonio L; Stama S; Zhao J; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):135-43. PubMed ID: 17898452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of reactor configuration and operational mode on Microthrix parvicella bulking and foaming in nutrient removal activated sludge systems.
    Noutsopoulos C; Mamais D; Andreadakis AD
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(1-2):61-4. PubMed ID: 12216689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.