287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17144532)
1. [Fluorescence in situ hybridization in diagnosis of urinary bladder cancer].
Stroganova AM; Khachaturian AV
Arkh Patol; 2006; 68(5):43-6. PubMed ID: 17144532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Detection of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization].
Zhang YG; Bi XG; Han YL; Cai Y; Xu X; Wu YP; Yang YL; Ma JH; Zhao P; Jia XM; Wang MR
Ai Zheng; 2007 Feb; 26(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 17298751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fluorescence in situ hybridization performed on exfoliated urothelial cells in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.
Degtyar P; Neulander E; Zirkin H; Yusim I; Douvdevani A; Mermershtain W; Kaneti J; Manor E
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):398-401. PubMed ID: 14972510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Molecular cytogenetic study of bladder transitional cell carcinoma by FISH].
Shou J; Wang M; Ma J
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 22(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 11776593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bladder irrigation specimens assayed by fluorescence in situ hybridization to interphase nuclei.
Wheeless LL; Reeder JE; Han R; O'Connell MJ; Frank IN; Cockett AT; Hopman AH
Cytometry; 1994 Dec; 17(4):319-26. PubMed ID: 7875039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative diagnostic value of urine cytology, UBC-ELISA, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder in routine clinical practice.
May M; Hakenberg OW; Gunia S; Pohling P; Helke C; Lübbe L; Nowack R; Siegsmund M; Hoschke B
Urology; 2007 Sep; 70(3):449-53. PubMed ID: 17688921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative molecular urinary cytology by fluorescence in situ hybridization: a tool for tailoring surveillance of patients with superficial bladder cancer?
Bollmann M; Heller H; Bánkfalvi A; Griefingholt H; Bollmann R
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1219-25. PubMed ID: 15892805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FISH--a new noninvasive method for the diagnosis of urinary bladder carcinomas.
Lübbe L; Nowack R; May M; Ullmann K; Gunia S; Kaufmann O; Hakenberg O; Muche J; Hoschke B
Clin Lab; 2004; 50(7-8):395-402. PubMed ID: 15330506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive detection of alterations in chromosome numbers in urinary bladder cancer cells, using fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Okamura T; Umemoto Y; Yasui T; Saiki S; Kuroda H; Kotoh S; Kamizaki H
Int J Clin Oncol; 2004 Oct; 9(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 15549587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Numerical aberrations of chromosome 17 and the 9p21 locus are independent predictors of tumor recurrence in non-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
Krüger S; Mess F; Böhle A; Feller AC
Int J Oncol; 2003 Jul; 23(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 12792774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical value of aneusomy of chromosomes in exfoliated urothelial cells to predict the recurrence of superficial bladder cancer after complete transurethral resection].
Bao QB; Liu J; Sun HB; Su JH; Zhu JG; Lin JZ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 89(8):548-51. PubMed ID: 19567078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The FISH test for the diagnosis, surveillance, and prognosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.
Haddad FS
J Med Liban; 2008; 56(4):230-2. PubMed ID: 19115598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fluorescent in situ hybridization as a predictor of relapse in urothelial carcinoma.
García-Peláez B; Trias I; Román R; Pubill C; Banús JM; Puig X
Actas Urol Esp; 2013; 37(7):395-400. PubMed ID: 23453297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ki-67 fraction, p53 alteration and numerical chromosome aberrations (chromosomes 7 and 17) in formalin fixed bladder tumors].
Moch H; Sauter G; Gudat F; Waldman F; Mihatsch MJ
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 1993; 77():226-30. PubMed ID: 7511286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Demonstration of gene amplification in urinary bladder cancer by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)].
Sauter G; Moch H; Gudat F; Mihatsch MJ; Haley J; Meecker T; Waldman F
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 1993; 77():247-51. PubMed ID: 7511290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Centrosome hyperamplification predicts progression and tumor recurrence in bladder cancer.
Yamamoto Y; Matsuyama H; Furuya T; Oga A; Yoshihiro S; Okuda M; Kawauchi S; Sasaki K; Naito K
Clin Cancer Res; 2004 Oct; 10(19):6449-55. PubMed ID: 15475431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is aneusomy of chromosome 9 alone a valid biomarker for urinary bladder cancer screening?
Panani AD; Kozirakis D; Anastasiou J; Babanaraki A; Malovrouvas D; Roussos C
Anticancer Res; 2006; 26(2A):1161-5. PubMed ID: 16619518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Numerical aberrations of chromosomes 11 and 17 detected by fish--fluorescence in situ hybridization combined with cytology in exfoliated cells from voided urine in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder].
Asali MG; Kaneti J; Manor E
Harefuah; 2007 Dec; 146(12):914-9, 1000. PubMed ID: 18254439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. UroVysion compared with cytology and quantitative cytology in the surveillance of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Moonen PM; Merkx GF; Peelen P; Karthaus HF; Smeets DF; Witjes JA
Eur Urol; 2007 May; 51(5):1275-80; discussion 1280. PubMed ID: 17084511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. C-erb-2 gene amplification and chromosomal anomalies in bladder cancer: preliminary results.
Leonardo C; Merola R; Orlandi G; Leonardo F; Rondoni M; De Nunzio C
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Dec; 24(4):633-8. PubMed ID: 16471327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]