159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17144762)
1. Framing discrimination: effects of inclusion versus exclusion mind-sets on stereotypic judgments.
Hugenberg K; Bodenhausen GV; McLain M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 91(6):1020-31. PubMed ID: 17144762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Young children's evaluations of exclusion in gender-stereotypic peer contexts.
Theimer CE; Killen M; Stangor C
Dev Psychol; 2001 Jan; 37(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 11206429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Need for cognition can magnify or attenuate priming effects in social judgment.
Petty RE; DeMarree KG; Briñol P; Horcajo J; Strathman AJ
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 34(7):900-12. PubMed ID: 18463396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When tolerance leads to intolerance: accessibility effects on social judgment.
Araya T; Ekehammar B
Scand J Psychol; 2009 Aug; 50(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19392948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gender stereotyping and decision processes: extending and reversing the gender bias in fame judgments.
Buchner A; Steffens MC; Berry DC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11009254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When the association between appearance and outcome contaminates social judgment: a bidirectional model linking group homogeneity and collective treatment.
Alter AL; Darley JM
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Nov; 97(5):776-95. PubMed ID: 19857001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cognitive processes in stereotype formation: the role of correct contingency learning for biased group judgments.
Meiser T; Hewstone M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Nov; 87(5):599-614. PubMed ID: 15535774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Of gnomes and leprechauns: the recruitment of recent and categorical contexts in social judgment.
Pettibone JC; Wedell DH
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):361-89. PubMed ID: 17196919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment.
Förster J; Liberman N; Kuschel S
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):579-99. PubMed ID: 18361673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Children's understanding of posterior probability.
Girotto V; Gonzalez M
Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):325-44. PubMed ID: 17391661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior.
Amodio DM; Devine PG
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Oct; 91(4):652-61. PubMed ID: 17014291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of stereotypes on decision making and information-processing strategies.
Bodenhausen GV; Wyer RS
J Pers Soc Psychol; 1985 Feb; 48(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 3981396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Context effects on remembering and knowing: the expectancy heuristic.
McCabe DP; Balota DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):536-49. PubMed ID: 17470004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fast and confident: postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study.
Sauerland M; Sporer SL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 19309216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating fame judgments: on the generality of hypotheses, conclusions, and measurement models.
Buchner A; Wippich W
Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):226-31. PubMed ID: 8733933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perspective-takers behave more stereotypically.
Galinsky AD; Wang CS; Ku G
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 95(2):404-19. PubMed ID: 18665710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does aging affect the use of shifting standards?
Hoessler C; Chasteen AL
Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 18189164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Strategies for social inference: a similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates.
Ames DR
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Nov; 87(5):573-85. PubMed ID: 15535772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring the neural correlates of social stereotyping.
Quadflieg S; Turk DJ; Waiter GD; Mitchell JP; Jenkins AC; Macrae CN
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1560-70. PubMed ID: 18752409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of accessibility and subjective relevance on the use of piecemeal and category information in impression formation.
Köpetz C; Kruglanski AW
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 34(5):692-705. PubMed ID: 18308925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
