These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17144834)

  • 1. An experimental comparison of rater performance on an SP-based clinical skills exam.
    Han JJ; Kreiter CD; Park H; Ferguson KJ
    Teach Learn Med; 2006; 18(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 17144834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A feasibility study comparing checklists and global rating forms to assess resident performance in clinical skills.
    Ringsted C; Østergaard D; Ravn L; Pedersen JA; Berlac PA; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Teach; 2003 Nov; 25(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 15369915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Checklist content on a standardized patient assessment: an ex post facto review.
    Boulet JR; van Zanten M; de Champlain A; Hawkins RE; Peitzman SJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 16871427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rater errors in a clinical skills assessment of medical students.
    Iramaneerat C; Yudkowsky R
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Sep; 30(3):266-83. PubMed ID: 17693619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between experience with standardized patient examinations and subsequent standardized patient examination performance: a potential problem with standardized patient exam validity.
    Talente G; Haist SA; Wilson JF
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Mar; 30(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 17293609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Good questions, good answers: construct alignment improves the performance of workplace-based assessment scales.
    Crossley J; Johnson G; Booth J; Wade W
    Med Educ; 2011 Jun; 45(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 21501218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adapting mini-CEX scoring to improve inter-rater reliability.
    Ogunbanjo GA
    Med Educ; 2009 May; 43(5):484-5. PubMed ID: 19437590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of task exposure on repeat candidate scores in a high-stakes standardized patient assessment.
    Boulet JR; McKinley DW; Whelan GP; Hambleton RK
    Teach Learn Med; 2003; 15(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 14612253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Broadening perspectives on clinical performance assessment: rethinking the nature of in-training assessment.
    Govaerts MJ; van der Vleuten CP; Schuwirth LW; Muijtjens AM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2007 May; 12(2):239-60. PubMed ID: 17096207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conceptualising and classifying validity evidence for simulation.
    Andreatta PB; Gruppen LD
    Med Educ; 2009 Nov; 43(11):1028-35. PubMed ID: 19874494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Twelve tips for designing and implementing a structured rater training in OSCEs.
    Preusche I; Schmidts M; Wagner-Menghin M
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 22452283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Faculty, students, and actors as standardized patients: expanding opportunities for performance assessment.
    Mavis B; Turner J; Lovell K; Wagner D
    Teach Learn Med; 2006; 18(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 16626271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using standardized patients to assess the interpersonal skills of physicians: six years' experience with a high-stakes certification examination.
    van Zanten M; Boulet JR; McKinley D
    Health Commun; 2007; 22(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17967142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Have standardized patient examinations stood the test of time and experience?
    Williams RG
    Teach Learn Med; 2004; 16(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 15446298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of first-year veterinary students' clinical skills using objective structured clinical examinations.
    Hecker K; Read EK; Vallevand A; Krebs G; Donszelmann D; Muelling CK; Freeman SL
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 21135408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning intimate examinations with simulated patients: the evaluation of medical students' performance.
    Hendrickx K; De Winter B; Tjalma W; Avonts D; Peeraer G; Wyndaele JJ
    Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):e139-47. PubMed ID: 19404886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assurance best practices for simulation-based examinations.
    Furman GE; Smee S; Wilson C
    Simul Healthc; 2010 Aug; 5(4):226-31. PubMed ID: 21330801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a formative assessment tool for measurement of performance in multi-professional resuscitation teams.
    Andersen PO; Jensen MK; Lippert A; Østergaard D; Klausen TW
    Resuscitation; 2010 Jun; 81(6):703-11. PubMed ID: 20346566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-rater feedback with gap analysis: an innovative means to assess communication skill and self-insight.
    Calhoun AW; Rider EA; Peterson E; Meyer EC
    Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Sep; 80(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 20638814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of standardized patients in medical education.
    Nagoshi MH
    Hawaii Med J; 2001 Dec; 60(12):323-4. PubMed ID: 11836971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.