These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17146108)

  • 21. Quantitative analysis of perfusion studies: strengths and pitfalls.
    Slomka P; Xu Y; Berman D; Germano G
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 19(2):338-46. PubMed ID: 22302181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. SPECT radionuclide angiography: it is time for a consensus statement.
    Daou D
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Nov; 34(11):1729-34. PubMed ID: 17579855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The present role of nuclear cardiology in clinical practice.
    Clark AN; Beller GA
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Mar; 49(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 15724135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gating error because of prominent T waves with ECG-gated myocardial SPECT.
    Kim DW; Park SA; Kim CG
    Clin Nucl Med; 2008 Apr; 33(4):278-9. PubMed ID: 18356669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can administration of metoclopramide reduce artefacts related to abdominal activity in myocardial perfusion SPECT?
    Grüning T; Brogsitter C; Khonsari M; Jones IW; Nevin SM; Burchert W
    Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Dec; 27(12):953-7. PubMed ID: 17088680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. One size fits all?
    Hendel RC
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2006; 13(2):177-9. PubMed ID: 16580952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Common artifacts in PET myocardial perfusion images due to attenuation-emission misregistration: clinical significance, causes, and solutions.
    Loghin C; Sdringola S; Gould KL
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Jun; 45(6):1029-39. PubMed ID: 15181138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficacy of milk versus water to reduce interfering infra-cardiac activity in 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
    Hofman M; McKay J; Nandurkar D
    Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Nov; 27(11):837-42. PubMed ID: 17021422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Synergistic impact of attenuation correction and gating in routine myocardial SPECT reporting: 2 year follow-up study.
    Taneja S; Mohan HK; Blake GM; Livieratos L; Clarke SE
    Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Apr; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 18317305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The truncation artifact.
    Wosnitzer B; Gadiraju R; Depuey G
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2011 Feb; 18(1):187-91. PubMed ID: 20848254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The additive value of combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and ventricular function studies.
    Meine TJ; Hanson MW; Borges-Neto S
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Oct; 45(10):1721-4. PubMed ID: 15471840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. SPECT/CT evaluation of unusual physiologic radioiodine biodistributions: pearls and pitfalls in image interpretation.
    Glazer DI; Brown RK; Wong KK; Savas H; Gross MD; Avram AM
    Radiographics; 2013; 33(2):397-418. PubMed ID: 23479704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gallium SPECT/CT in lymphoma: the ups and downs of functional imaging.
    Bar-Shalom R
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Nov; 32(11):1247-9. PubMed ID: 16151766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A physiologic approach to decreasing upward creep of the heart during myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Karacalioglu AO; Jata B; Kilic S; Arslan N; Ilgan S; Ozguven MA
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2006 Dec; 34(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 17146109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of myocardial viability.
    Travin MI; Bergmann SR
    Semin Nucl Med; 2005 Jan; 35(1):2-16. PubMed ID: 15645391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantitative polar representation of left ventricular myocardial perfusion, function and viability using SPECT and cardiac magnetic resonance: initial results.
    Cain PA; Ugander M; Palmer J; Carlsson M; Heiberg E; Arheden H
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2005 Jul; 25(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 15972023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attenuation correction: eternal dilemma or real improvement?
    Hendel RC
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Mar; 49(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 15724134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of two software in gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission tomography, for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction, in patients with and without perfusion defects.
    Kakhki VR; Zakavi SR; Sadeghi R
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2007; 10(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 17450245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT perfusion images with low-dose CT: evaluation of the method by comparison with perfusion PET.
    Fricke E; Fricke H; Weise R; Kammeier A; Hagedorn R; Lotz N; Lindner O; Tschoepe D; Burchert W
    J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):736-44. PubMed ID: 15872344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ultrasound artifacts: classification, applied physics with illustrations, and imaging appearances.
    Prabhu SJ; Kanal K; Bhargava P; Vaidya S; Dighe MK
    Ultrasound Q; 2014 Jun; 30(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 24850030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.