These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17147076)

  • 1. Cortical localization of external urethral sphincter activation by transcranial electrical stimulation.
    Haghighi SS; Agrawal S
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 46(6):343-8. PubMed ID: 17147076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transcranial electric stimulation for intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: Stimulation parameters and electrode montages.
    Szelényi A; Kothbauer KF; Deletis V
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jul; 118(7):1586-95. PubMed ID: 17507288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraoperative monitoring of myogenic motor-evoked potentials from the external anal sphincter muscle to transcranial electrical stimulation.
    Inoue S; Kawaguchi M; Takashi S; Kakimoto M; Sakamoto T; Kitaguchi K; Furuya H; Morimoto T; Sakaki T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(21):E454-9. PubMed ID: 12438996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoperative facial motor evoked potential monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgery.
    Dong CC; Macdonald DB; Akagami R; Westerberg B; Alkhani A; Kanaan I; Hassounah M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):588-96. PubMed ID: 15721072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcranial stimulation parameters to elicit motor evoked potentials.
    Haghighi SS
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006; 46(7-8):409-12. PubMed ID: 17191733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of the neuromuscular blockade levels on amplitudes of posttetanic motor-evoked potentials and movement in response to transcranial stimulation in patients receiving propofol and fentanyl anesthesia.
    Yamamoto Y; Kawaguchi M; Hayashi H; Horiuchi T; Inoue S; Nakase H; Sakaki T; Furuya H
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Mar; 106(3):930-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18292442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repetitive vs. single transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of motor conduction in spine surgery.
    Haghighi SS; Gaines RW
    Mo Med; 2003; 100(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 12847868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The application of tetanic stimulation of the unilateral tibial nerve before transcranial stimulation can augment the amplitudes of myogenic motor-evoked potentials from the muscles in the bilateral upper and lower limbs.
    Hayashi H; Kawaguchi M; Yamamoto Y; Inoue S; Koizumi M; Ueda Y; Takakura Y; Furuya H
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jul; 107(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 18635490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noxious stimuli do not modify myogenic motor evoked potentials by electrical stimulation during anesthesia with propofol-based anesthesia.
    Inoue S; Kawaguchi M; Takahashi M; Kakimoto M; Sakamoto T; Kitaguchi K; Furuya H; Morimoto T; Sakaki T
    Can J Anaesth; 2003 Jan; 50(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 12514158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of low-dose ketamine on voltage requirement for transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials in children.
    Zaarour C; Engelhardt T; Strantzas S; Pehora C; Lewis S; Crawford MW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E627-30. PubMed ID: 18090070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrical and magnetic repetitive transcranial stimulation of the primary motor cortex in healthy subjects.
    Gilio F; Iacovelli E; Frasca V; Gabriele M; Giacomelli E; De Lena C; Cipriani AM; Inghilleri M
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 May; 455(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19429094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring in scoliosis surgery: comparison of desflurane/nitrous oxide with propofol total intravenous anesthetic regimens.
    Lo YL; Dan YF; Tan YE; Nurjannah S; Tan SB; Tan CT; Raman S
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2006 Jul; 18(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 16799350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring of scoliosis surgery with epidurally recorded motor evoked potentials (D wave) revealed false results.
    Ulkatan S; Neuwirth M; Bitan F; Minardi C; Kokoszka A; Deletis V
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 117(9):2093-101. PubMed ID: 16844406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of reliability of post-tetanic motor-evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery under general anesthesia.
    Hayashi H; Kawaguchi M; Yamamoto Y; Inoue S; Koizumi M; Ueda Y; Takakura Y; Furuya H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(26):E994-E1000. PubMed ID: 19092611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Activation of the external anal and urethral sphincter muscles by repetitive transcranial cortical stimulation during spine surgery.
    Haghighi SS; Zhang R
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2004 Feb; 18(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15139577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alarm criteria for motor-evoked potentials: what's wrong with the "presence-or-absence" approach?
    Calancie B; Molano MR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(4):406-14. PubMed ID: 18277873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodology for intraoperatively eliciting motor evoked potentials in the vocal muscles by electrical stimulation of the corticobulbar tract.
    Deletis V; Fernandez-Conejero I; Ulkatan S; Costantino P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):336-41. PubMed ID: 19136297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between the C5 or C6-Cz electrode assembly and C3 or C4-Cz assembly for transcranial electric motor activation of muscular response of the contralateral facial nerve.
    Verst SM; Chung TM; Sucena AC; Maldaun MV; Aguiar PH
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Dec; 154(12):2229-35. PubMed ID: 23053280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of posttetanic motor evoked potentials--the influences of repetitive use, the residual effects of tetanic stimulation to peripheral nerve, and the variability.
    Yamamoto Y; Kawaguchi M; Hayashi H; Abe R; Inoue S; Nakase H; Sakaki T; Furuya H
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 22(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 19779367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Significance of intraoperative motor function monitoring using transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (MEP) in patients with spinal and cranial lesions near the motor pathways.
    Krammer MJ; Wolf S; Schul DB; Gerstner W; Lumenta CB
    Br J Neurosurg; 2009 Feb; 23(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 19234909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.