These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Ngila: global pairwise alignments with logarithmic and affine gap costs. Cartwright RA Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 23(11):1427-8. PubMed ID: 17387111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A generalized affine gap model significantly improves protein sequence alignment accuracy. Zachariah MA; Crooks GE; Holbrook SR; Brenner SE Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 15562515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple sequence alignment with affine gap by using multi-objective genetic algorithm. Kaya M; Sarhan A; Alhajj R Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Apr; 114(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 24534604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Generalized affine gap costs for protein sequence alignment. Altschul SF Proteins; 1998 Jul; 32(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 9672045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lower bounds on multiple sequence alignment using exact 3-way alignment. Colbourn CJ; Kumar S BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 8():140. PubMed ID: 17470273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pairwise alignment of nucleotide sequences using maximal exact matches. Bayat A; Gaëta B; Ignjatovic A; Parameswaran S BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 20(1):261. PubMed ID: 31113356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Local sequence alignments with monotonic gap penalties. Mott R Bioinformatics; 1999 Jun; 15(6):455-62. PubMed ID: 10383814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of linear gap penalties and profile-based variable gap penalties in profile-profile alignments. Wang C; Yan RX; Wang XF; Si JN; Zhang Z Comput Biol Chem; 2011 Oct; 35(5):308-18. PubMed ID: 22000802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The performance of several multiple-sequence alignment programs in relation to secondary-structure features for an rRNA sequence. Hickson RE; Simon C; Perrey SW Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Apr; 17(4):530-9. PubMed ID: 10742045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pair hidden Markov models on tree structures. Sakakibara Y Bioinformatics; 2003; 19 Suppl 1():i232-40. PubMed ID: 12855464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A simulated annealing algorithm for finding consensus sequences. Keith JM; Adams P; Bryant D; Kroese DP; Mitchelson KR; Cochran DA; Lala GH Bioinformatics; 2002 Nov; 18(11):1494-9. PubMed ID: 12424121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of structure-based sequence alignment of automatic methods. Kim C; Lee B BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():355. PubMed ID: 17883866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fast, optimal alignment of three sequences using linear gap costs. Powell DR; Allison L; Dix TI J Theor Biol; 2000 Dec; 207(3):325-36. PubMed ID: 11082303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bi-alignments with affine gaps costs. Stadler PF; Will S Algorithms Mol Biol; 2022 May; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 35578255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Barking up the wrong treelength: the impact of gap penalty on alignment and tree accuracy. Liu K; Nelesen S; Raghavan S; Linder CR; Warnow T IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 19179695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SATe-II: very fast and accurate simultaneous estimation of multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees. Liu K; Warnow TJ; Holder MT; Nelesen SM; Yu J; Stamatakis AP; Linder CR Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):90-106. PubMed ID: 22139466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Normalization of affine gap costs used in optimal sequence alignment. Allison L J Theor Biol; 1993 Mar; 161(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 8331953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]