These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1714812)

  • 1. On cortical folds and neuromagnetic fields.
    Kaufman L; Kaufman JH; Wang JZ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Sep; 79(3):211-26. PubMed ID: 1714812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dipole separability in a neuromagnetic source analysis.
    Lütkenhöner B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 May; 45(5):572-81. PubMed ID: 9581055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A ring-shaped distribution of dipoles as a source model of induced gamma-band activity.
    Tallon-Baudry C; Bertrand O; Pernier J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Apr; 110(4):660-5. PubMed ID: 10378735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic source imaging based on the minimum-norm least-squares inverse.
    Wang JZ; Williamson SJ; Kaufman L
    Brain Topogr; 1993; 5(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 8357709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.
    Cuffin BN; Cohen D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1979 Aug; 47(2):132-46. PubMed ID: 95707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Approximating dipoles from human EEG activity: the effect of dipole source configuration on dipolarity using single dipole models.
    Hara J; Musha T; Shankle WR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Feb; 46(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 9932333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatiotemporal forward solution of the EEG and MEG using network modeling.
    Jirsa VK; Jantzen KJ; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 May; 21(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 12071620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationships between sleep spindles and activities of cerebral cortex as determined by simultaneous EEG and MEG recording.
    Urakami Y
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 18303556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetoencephalography and its Achilles' heel.
    Lütkenhöner B
    J Physiol Paris; 2003; 97(4-6):641-58. PubMed ID: 15242672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross Laminar Traveling Components of Field Potentials due to Volume Conduction of Non-Traveling Neuronal Activity in Macaque Sensory Cortices.
    Orczyk JJ; Barczak A; Costa-Faidella J; Kajikawa Y
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(36):7578-7590. PubMed ID: 34321312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling the effect of dendritic input location on MEG and EEG source dipoles.
    Ahlfors SP; Wreh C
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Sep; 53(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 25863693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of whole-head MEG to activity in the adult human cortex.
    Hillebrand A; Barnes GR
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jul; 16(3 Pt 1):638-50. PubMed ID: 12169249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data.
    Mosher JC; Lewis PS; Leahy RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jun; 39(6):541-57. PubMed ID: 1601435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial and frequency differences of neuromagnetic activities in processing concrete and abstract words.
    Liu Y; Xiang J; Wang Y; Vannest JJ; Byars AW; Rose DF
    Brain Topogr; 2008; 20(3):123-9. PubMed ID: 18058218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of hyper-parameters for a hierarchical model of combined cortical and extra-brain current sources in the MEG inverse problem.
    Morishige K; Yoshioka T; Kawawaki D; Hiroe N; Sato MA; Kawato M
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():320-36. PubMed ID: 25034620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectral spatiotemporal imaging of cortical oscillations and interactions in the human brain.
    Lin FH; Witzel T; Hämäläinen MS; Dale AM; Belliveau JW; Stufflebeam SM
    Neuroimage; 2004 Oct; 23(2):582-95. PubMed ID: 15488408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A random dipole model for spontaneous brain activity.
    de Munck JC; Vijn PC; Lopes da Silva FH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Aug; 39(8):791-804. PubMed ID: 1505993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Graph properties of synchronized cortical networks during visual working memory maintenance.
    Palva S; Monto S; Palva JM
    Neuroimage; 2010 Feb; 49(4):3257-68. PubMed ID: 19932756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.