183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17148204)
21. Potential for transmission of infections in networks of cattle farms.
Volkova VV; Howey R; Savill NJ; Woolhouse MEJ
Epidemics; 2010 Sep; 2(3):116-122. PubMed ID: 21352782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Controlling infectious disease through the targeted manipulation of contact network structure.
Gates MC; Woolhouse ME
Epidemics; 2015 Sep; 12():11-9. PubMed ID: 26342238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An analysis of the movement of dairy cattle through 2 large livestock markets in the province of Ontario, Canada.
Dubé C; Ribble C; Kelton D
Can Vet J; 2010 Nov; 51(11):1254-60. PubMed ID: 21286326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Analysis of cattle movement networks in Paraguay: Implications for the spread and control of infectious diseases.
Avalos A; Durand B; Naranjo J; Maldonado V; Canini L; Zanella G
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278999. PubMed ID: 36534658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Animal movement in a pastoralist population in the Maasai Mara Ecosystem in Kenya and implications for pathogen spread and control.
Omondi GP; Obanda V; VanderWaal K; Deen J; Travis DA
Prev Vet Med; 2021 Mar; 188():105259. PubMed ID: 33453561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Social network analysis of Equidae movements and its application to risk-based surveillance and to control of spread of potential Equidae diseases.
Sánchez-Matamoros A; Martínez-López B; Sánchez-Vizcaíno F; Sánchez-Vizcaíno JM
Transbound Emerg Dis; 2013 Oct; 60(5):448-59. PubMed ID: 22830597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Estimation of distance related probability of animal movements between holdings and implications for disease spread modeling.
Lindström T; Sisson SA; Nöremark M; Jonsson A; Wennergren U
Prev Vet Med; 2009 Oct; 91(2-4):85-94. PubMed ID: 19540009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A descriptive analysis of the growth of unrecorded interactions amongst cattle-raising premises in Scotland and their implications for disease spread.
Enright J; Kao RR
BMC Vet Res; 2016 Feb; 12():37. PubMed ID: 26911436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Paradoxical effects of coupling infectious livestock populations and imposing transport restrictions.
Lamouroux D; Nagler J; Geisel T; Eule S
Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Feb; 282(1800):20142805. PubMed ID: 25540282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Network analysis of the German cattle trade net--preliminary results].
Lentz H; Kasper M; Selhorst T
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2009; 122(5-6):193-8. PubMed ID: 19517933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A description of cattle movements in two departments of Buenos Aires province, Argentina.
León EA; Stevenson MA; Duffy SJ; Ledesma M; Morris RS
Prev Vet Med; 2006 Sep; 76(1-2):109-20. PubMed ID: 16777252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bayesian analysis of animal movements related to factors at herd and between herd levels: Implications for disease spread modeling.
Lindström T; Sisson SA; Lewerin SS; Wennergren U
Prev Vet Med; 2011 Mar; 98(4):230-42. PubMed ID: 21176982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Network analysis of pig movements in Argentina: Identification of key farms in the spread of infectious diseases and their biosecurity levels.
Alarcón LV; Cipriotti PA; Monterubbianessi M; Perfumo C; Mateu E; Allepuz A
Transbound Emerg Dis; 2020 May; 67(3):1152-1163. PubMed ID: 31785089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Temporal characterisation of the network of Danish cattle movements and its implication for disease control: 2000-2009.
Mweu MM; Fournié G; Halasa T; Toft N; Nielsen SS
Prev Vet Med; 2013 Jul; 110(3-4):379-87. PubMed ID: 23473852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessing biosecurity practices, movements and densities of poultry sites across Belgium, resulting in different farm risk-groups for infectious disease introduction and spread.
Van Steenwinkel S; Ribbens S; Ducheyne E; Goossens E; Dewulf J
Prev Vet Med; 2011 Mar; 98(4):259-70. PubMed ID: 21195492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cattle movement as a risk factor for epidemics.
Hässig M; Meier AB; Braun U; Urech Hässig B; Schmidt R; Lewis F
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 2015 Aug; 157(8):441-8. PubMed ID: 26753364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Direct and indirect contacts between cattle farms in north-west England.
Brennan ML; Kemp R; Christley RM
Prev Vet Med; 2008 May; 84(3-4):242-60. PubMed ID: 18222555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Static network analysis of a pork supply chain in Northern Germany-Characterisation of the potential spread of infectious diseases via animal movements.
Büttner K; Krieter J; Traulsen A; Traulsen I
Prev Vet Med; 2013 Jul; 110(3-4):418-28. PubMed ID: 23462679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Heck cattle in the Oostvaardersplassen: risk for infectious diseases or not?].
Hessels AL; van der Poel WH; Nielen M; Emmerzaal A; Schukken YH
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 2000 Jan; 125(2):38-46. PubMed ID: 10666788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Paratuberculosis: the pathogen and routes of infection].
Gerlach GF
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2002 Dec; 109(12):504-6. PubMed ID: 12596562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
