These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17148249)

  • 1. Sperm competition games: optimal sperm allocation in response to the size of competing ejaculates.
    Engqvist L; Reinhold K
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jan; 274(1607):209-17. PubMed ID: 17148249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sperm competition games: sperm selection by females.
    Ball MA; Parker GA
    J Theor Biol; 2003 Sep; 224(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 12900202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Theoretical influence of female mating status and remating propensity on male sperm allocation patterns.
    Engqvist L; Reinhold K
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Sep; 19(5):1448-58. PubMed ID: 16910976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4.
    Misra S; Wolfner MF
    Elife; 2020 Jul; 9():. PubMed ID: 32672537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual selection and sperm quantity: meta-analyses of strategic ejaculation.
    Kelly CD; Jennions MD
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 Nov; 86(4):863-84. PubMed ID: 21414127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Male crickets adjust the viability of their sperm in response to female mating status.
    Thomas ML; Simmons LW
    Am Nat; 2007 Aug; 170(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 17874370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rival male relatedness does not affect ejaculate allocation as predicted by sperm competition theory.
    Thomas ML; Simmons LW
    PLoS One; 2008 May; 3(5):e2151. PubMed ID: 18478102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual adjustment of sperm expenditure accords with sperm competition theory.
    Pilastro A; Scaggiante M; Rasotto MB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Jul; 99(15):9913-5. PubMed ID: 12107282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection on female remating interval is influenced by male sperm competition strategies and ejaculate characteristics.
    Alonzo SH; Pizzari T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2013 Mar; 368(1613):20120044. PubMed ID: 23339235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Female sperm use and storage between fertilization events drive sperm competition and male ejaculate allocation.
    Requena GS; Alonzo SH
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3433-44. PubMed ID: 25307988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Male alternative reproductive tactics and sperm competition: a meta-analysis.
    Dougherty LR; Skirrow MJA; Jennions MD; Simmons LW
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2022 Aug; 97(4):1365-1388. PubMed ID: 35229450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The evolution of sperm-allocation strategies and the degree of sperm competition.
    Williams PD; Day T; Cameron E
    Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):492-9. PubMed ID: 15856692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Male-derived cuticular hydrocarbons signal sperm competition intensity and affect ejaculate expenditure in crickets.
    Thomas ML; Simmons LW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Jan; 276(1655):383-8. PubMed ID: 18854298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sperm competition games: the risk model can generate higher sperm allocation to virgin females.
    Ball MA; Parker GA
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):767-79. PubMed ID: 17305842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Male crickets adjust ejaculate quality with both risk and intensity of sperm competition.
    Simmons LW; Denholm A; Jackson C; Levy E; Madon E
    Biol Lett; 2007 Oct; 3(5):520-2. PubMed ID: 17686757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolution of strategic male mating effort in an information transfer framework.
    Engqvist L; Taborsky M
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Jun; 30(6):1143-1152. PubMed ID: 28374957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tactic-specific differences in seminal fluid influence sperm performance.
    Locatello L; Poli F; Rasotto MB
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Mar; 280(1755):20122891. PubMed ID: 23363633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sperm competition games: a general model for precopulatory male-male competition.
    Parker GA; Lessells CM; Simmons LW
    Evolution; 2013 Jan; 67(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 23289564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exposure to sperm competition risk improves survival of virgin males.
    Moatt JP; Dytham C; Thom MD
    Biol Lett; 2013 Apr; 9(2):20121188. PubMed ID: 23445944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceived sperm competition intensity influences seminal fluid protein production prior to courtship and mating.
    Fedorka KM; Winterhalter WE; Ware B
    Evolution; 2011 Feb; 65(2):584-90. PubMed ID: 21271997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.