These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17148269)
1. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation. Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence. Skelhorn J; Rowe C Biol Lett; 2006 Sep; 2(3):348-50. PubMed ID: 17148400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey. Skelhorn J; Rowe C Biol Lett; 2005 Dec; 1(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 17148243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical. Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prey attack and predators defend: counterattacking prey trigger parental care in predators. Magalhães S; Janssen A; Montserrat M; Sabelis MW Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Sep; 272(1575):1929-33. PubMed ID: 16191599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolutionarily stable defence and signalling of that defence. Broom M; Speed MP; Ruxton GD J Theor Biol; 2006 Sep; 242(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 16529773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decision time and prey gregariousness influence attack probability in naïve and experienced predators. Gamberale-Stille G Anim Behav; 2000 Jul; 60(1):95-99. PubMed ID: 10924208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ability of lizards to identify an artificial Batesian mimic. Beneš J; Veselý P Zoology (Jena); 2017 Aug; 123():46-52. PubMed ID: 28716358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Social learning within and across predator species reduces attacks on novel aposematic prey. Hämäläinen L; Mappes J; Rowland HM; Teichmann M; Thorogood R J Anim Ecol; 2020 May; 89(5):1153-1164. PubMed ID: 32077104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness. Merilaita S; Ruxton GD J Theor Biol; 2007 Mar; 245(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 17157321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The benefits of being toxic to deter predators depends on prey body size. Smith KE; Halpin CG; Rowe C Behav Ecol; 2016; 27(6):1650-1655. PubMed ID: 28028378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]