These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17148400)

  • 1. Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Biol Lett; 2006 Sep; 2(3):348-50. PubMed ID: 17148400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Biol Lett; 2005 Dec; 1(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 17148243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automimicry destabilizes aposematism: predator sample-and-reject behaviour may provide a solution.
    Gamberale-Stille G; Guilford T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Dec; 271(1557):2621-5. PubMed ID: 15615689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.
    Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predators' toxin burdens influence their strategic decisions to eat toxic prey.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Curr Biol; 2007 Sep; 17(17):1479-83. PubMed ID: 17716896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tasting the difference: do multiple defence chemicals interact in Müllerian mimicry?
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Feb; 272(1560):339-45. PubMed ID: 15705561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.
    Puurtinen M; Kaitala V
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Better the devil you know: avian predators find variation in prey toxicity aversive.
    Barnett CA; Bateson M; Rowe C
    Biol Lett; 2014 Nov; 10(11):20140533. PubMed ID: 25392317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Body size matters for aposematic prey during predator aversion learning.
    Smith KE; Halpin CG; Rowe C
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():173-9. PubMed ID: 25256160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):751-63. PubMed ID: 10937250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aposematism: what should our starting point be?
    Speed MP; Ruxton GD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Feb; 272(1561):431-8. PubMed ID: 15734698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aposematism: balancing salience and camouflage.
    Barnett JB; Scott-Samuel NE; Cuthill IC
    Biol Lett; 2016 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 27484645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Both Palatable and Unpalatable Butterflies Use Bright Colors to Signal Difficulty of Capture to Predators.
    Pinheiro CE; Freitas AV; Campos VC; DeVries PJ; Penz CM
    Neotrop Entomol; 2016 Apr; 45(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 26911159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical.
    Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Birds learn to use distastefulness as a signal of toxicity.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Jun; 277(1688):1729-34. PubMed ID: 20129989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Birds learn to avoid aposematic prey by using the appearance of host plants.
    McLellan CF; Scott-Samuel NE; Cuthill IC
    Curr Biol; 2021 Dec; 31(23):5364-5369.e4. PubMed ID: 34624210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explaining the evolution of warning coloration: secreted secondary defence chemicals may facilitate the evolution of visual aposematic signals.
    Gohli J; Högstedt G
    PLoS One; 2009 Jun; 4(6):e5779. PubMed ID: 19492013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased predation of nutrient-enriched aposematic prey.
    Halpin CG; Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Apr; 281(1781):20133255. PubMed ID: 24598424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolutionarily stable defence and signalling of that defence.
    Broom M; Speed MP; Ruxton GD
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Sep; 242(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 16529773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness.
    Merilaita S; Ruxton GD
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Mar; 245(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 17157321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.