114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17148821)
1. Ideal spatial radiotherapy dose distributions subject to positional uncertainties.
Sir MY; Pollock SM; Epelman MA; Lam KL; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(24):6329-47. PubMed ID: 17148821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A strategy to objectively evaluate the necessity of correcting detected target deviations in image guided radiotherapy.
Yue NJ; Kim S; Jabbour S; Narra V; Haffty BG
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4340-7. PubMed ID: 18072499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical note: dose-volume histogram analysis in radiotherapy using the Gaussian error function.
Chow JC; Markel D; Jiang R
Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1398-402. PubMed ID: 18491534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Margins for treatment planning of proton therapy.
Thomas SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1491-501. PubMed ID: 16510958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of dose compensation in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Wu Q; Liang J; Yan D
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1405-19. PubMed ID: 16510952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1967-90. PubMed ID: 17374922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confidence intervals in dose volume histogram computation.
Cutanda Henríquez F; Vargas Castrillón S
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1545-53. PubMed ID: 20443475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose-volume population histogram: a new tool for evaluating plans whilst considering geometrical uncertainties.
Nguyen TB; Hoole AC; Burnet NG; Thomas SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):935-47. PubMed ID: 19147901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dealing with geometric uncertainties in dose painting by numbers: introducing the ΔVH.
Witte M; Shakirin G; Houweling A; Peulen H; van Herk M
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):402-6. PubMed ID: 21937139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inverse planning incorporating organ motion.
Li JG; Xing L
Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1573-8. PubMed ID: 10947260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiobiological evaluation of breast cancer radiotherapy accounting for the effects of patient positioning and breathing in dose delivery. A meta analysis.
Tzikas A; Komisopoulos G; Ferreira BC; Hyodynmaa S; Axelsson S; Papanikolaou N; Lavdas E; Lind BK; Mavroidis P
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Feb; 12(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 22775337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of Monte Carlo statistical uncertainties on the evaluation of dose distributions in radiation treatment planning.
Kawrakow I
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(8):1549-56. PubMed ID: 15152691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On relating the generalized equivalent uniform dose formalism to the linear-quadratic model.
Djajaputra D; Wu Q
Med Phys; 2006 Dec; 33(12):4481-9. PubMed ID: 17278799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incorporating organ movements in inverse planning: assessing dose uncertainties by Bayesian inference.
Unkelbach J; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 50(1):121-39. PubMed ID: 15715427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation-induced statistical uncertainty in the threshold voltage measurement of MOSFET dosimeters.
Benson C; Price RA; Silvie J; Jaksic A; Joyce MJ
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(14):3145-59. PubMed ID: 15357188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Planning target volume margin evaluation and critical structure sparing for rectal cancer patients treated prone on a bellyboard.
Cranmer-Sargison G; Kundapur V; Park-Somers E; Andreas J; Vachhrajani H; Sidhu NP
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2013 Mar; 25(3):e17-22. PubMed ID: 22925598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EUD-based radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation: incorporating physical and Monte Carlo statistical dose uncertainties.
Cranmer-Sargison G; Zavgorodni S
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16177533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
