These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17148825)

  • 1. Contrast-transfer improvement for electrode displacement elastography.
    Bharat S; Varghese T
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(24):6403-18. PubMed ID: 17148825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of strain-based and model-based modulus elastography.
    Doyley MM; Srinivasan S; Pendergrass SA; Wu Z; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):787-802. PubMed ID: 15936495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio and their trade-offs with resolution in axial-shear strain elastography.
    Thitaikumar A; Krouskop TA; Ophir J
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 17183125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance evaluation of methods for two-dimensional displacement and strain estimation using ultrasound radio frequency data.
    Lopata RG; Nillesen MM; Hansen HH; Gerrits IH; Thijssen JM; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):796-812. PubMed ID: 19282094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing the performance of model-based elastography by incorporating additional a priori information in the modulus image reconstruction process.
    Doyley MM; Srinivasan S; Dimidenko E; Soni N; Ophir J
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(1):95-112. PubMed ID: 16357433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wavelet denoising of displacement estimates in elastography.
    Techavipoo U; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):477-91. PubMed ID: 15121250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transient elastography using impulsive ultrasound radiation force: a preliminary comparison with surface palpation elastography.
    Melodelima D; Bamber JC; Duck FA; Shipley JA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 33(6):959-69. PubMed ID: 17445967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: experimental and in vivo results.
    Chen H; Varghese T; Rahko PS; Zagzebski JA
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Jan; 49(1):98-111. PubMed ID: 18657839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transient displacement induced in shear wave elastography: comparison between analytical results and ultrasound measurements.
    Elkateb Hachemi M; Callé S; Remenieras JP
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e221-5. PubMed ID: 16843510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying the mechanical properties of tissue by ultrasound strain imaging.
    Turgay E; Salcudean S; Rohling R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 32(2):221-35. PubMed ID: 16464668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise reduction using spatial-angular compounding for elastography.
    Techavipoo U; Chen Q; Varghese T; Zagzebski JA; Madsen EL
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 May; 51(5):510-20. PubMed ID: 15217229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A mechanical model to compute elastic modulus of tissues for harmonic motion imaging.
    Shan B; Pelegri AA; Maleke C; Konofagou EE
    J Biomech; 2008 Jul; 41(10):2150-8. PubMed ID: 18571182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards an acoustic model-based poroelastic imaging method: II. experimental investigation.
    Berry GP; Bamber JC; Miller NR; Barbone PE; Bush NL; Armstrong CG
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1869-85. PubMed ID: 17169699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the differences between two-dimensional and three-dimensional simulations for assessing elastographic image quality: a simulation study.
    Patil AV; Krouskop TA; Ophir J; Srinivasan S
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1129-38. PubMed ID: 18343016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation analysis of three-dimensional strain imaging using ultrasound two-dimensional array transducers.
    Rao M; Varghese T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1858-65. PubMed ID: 19045676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Principal component analysis of shear strain effects.
    Chen H; Varghese T
    Ultrasonics; 2009 May; 49(4-5):472-83. PubMed ID: 19201435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Viscoelastic parameter estimation based on spectral analysis.
    Eskandari H; Salcudean SE; Rohling R
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jul; 55(7):1611-25. PubMed ID: 18986951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative viscoelastic parameters measured by harmonic motion imaging.
    Vappou J; Maleke C; Konofagou EE
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3579-94. PubMed ID: 19454785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elastographic contrast generation in optical coherence tomography from a localized shear stress.
    Grimwood A; Garcia L; Bamber J; Holmes J; Woolliams P; Tomlins P; Pankhurst QA
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(18):5515-28. PubMed ID: 20798457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shear modulus reconstruction in dynamic elastography: time harmonic case.
    Park E; Maniatty AM
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3697-721. PubMed ID: 16861775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.