239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17149015)
1. Handling missing data: a commonly encountered problem in quantitative research.
Duffy ME
Clin Nurse Spec; 2006; 20(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 17149015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Missing data: an introductory conceptual overview for the novice researcher.
El-Masri MM; Fox-Wasylyshyn SM
Can J Nurs Res; 2005 Dec; 37(4):156-71. PubMed ID: 16541824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The missing data dilemma.
Squires ME; Tourangeau A
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(4):33-40. PubMed ID: 19947309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple imputation for missing data.
Patrician PA
Res Nurs Health; 2002 Feb; 25(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 11807922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Triangulation.
Ramprogus V
Nurse Res; 2005; 12(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 16045042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Triangulation as a method for contemporary nursing research.
Halcomb E; Andrew S
Nurse Res; 2005; 13(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 16416981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding research: 3. Critiquing findings and conclusions.
Baxter H
J Wound Care; 2001 Oct; 10(9):376-9. PubMed ID: 12964283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and validity in research.
Roberts P; Priest H
Nurs Stand; 2006 Jul 12-18; 20(44):41-5. PubMed ID: 16872117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Secondary analysis of data.
Coyer SM; Gallo AM
J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 15662366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and validity in practice: assessment tools.
Alison T; Shields L
Paediatr Nurs; 2005 Nov; 17(9):43. PubMed ID: 16315818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Triangulation: operational definitions.
Kimchi J; Polivka B; Stevenson JS
Nurs Res; 1991; 40(6):364-6. PubMed ID: 1956817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative vs qualitative research.
Brink H
Nurs RSA; 1991 Jan; 6(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 2011171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Case study: design? Method? Or comprehensive strategy?
Jones C; Lyons C
Nurse Res; 2004; 11(3):70-6. PubMed ID: 15065485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finding, selecting, and evaluating instruments to support decision-making: part 2 of 3.
Windle PE; Throckmorton T
J Perianesth Nurs; 2007 Oct; 22(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 17982800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mixed methods research for the novice researcher.
Giddings LS; Grant BM
Contemp Nurse; 2006 Oct; 23(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 17083315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software.
Cope DG
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2014 May; 41(3):322-3. PubMed ID: 24769596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A guide to research methodology.
Lewis PA; Nelson EA
J Wound Care; 1998 Jul; 7(7):361-2. PubMed ID: 9791368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Stories and numbers: coexistence without compromise.
Ford-Gilboe M; Campbell J; Berman H
ANS Adv Nurs Sci; 1995 Sep; 18(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 7486889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diaries as a data collection strategy.
Jarrett M
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2000 Mar; 27(2):92. PubMed ID: 10729179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement, reliability, and bias in measurement: Commentary on Bland and Altman (1986; 2010).
Beckstead JW
Int J Nurs Stud; 2011 Jan; 48(1):134-5. PubMed ID: 20850746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
