369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17149551)
1. Construct and face validity and task workload for laparoscopic camera navigation: virtual reality versus videotrainer systems at the SAGES Learning Center.
Stefanidis D; Haluck R; Pham T; Dunne JB; Reinke T; Markley S; Korndorffer JR; Arellano P; Jones DB; Scott DJ
Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1158-64. PubMed ID: 17149551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Construct and face validity of MIST-VR, Endotower, and CELTS: are we ready for skills assessment using simulators?
Maithel S; Sierra R; Korndorffer J; Neumann P; Dawson S; Callery M; Jones D; Scott D
Surg Endosc; 2006 Jan; 20(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 16333535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Construct and face validity of a virtual reality-based camera navigation curriculum.
Shetty S; Panait L; Baranoski J; Dudrick SJ; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Duffy AJ
J Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 177(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 22739048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new virtual-reality training module for laparoscopic surgical skills and equipment handling: can multitasking be trained? A randomized controlled trial.
Bongers PJ; Diederick van Hove P; Stassen LP; Dankelman J; Schreuder HW
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 25439179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychomotor testing predicts rate of skill acquisition for proficiency-based laparoscopic skills training.
Stefanidis D; Korndorffer JR; Black FW; Dunne JB; Sierra R; Touchard CL; Rice DA; Markert RJ; Kastl PR; Scott DJ
Surgery; 2006 Aug; 140(2):252-62. PubMed ID: 16904977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attempted establishment of proficiency levels for laparoscopic performance on a national scale using simulation: the results from the 2004 SAGES Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) learning center study.
Van Sickle KR; Ritter EM; McClusky DA; Lederman A; Baghai M; Gallagher AG; Smith CD
Surg Endosc; 2007 Jan; 21(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17111280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Simulation training in surgical education - application of virtual reality laparoscopic simulators in a surgical skills course].
Lehmann KS; Gröne J; Lauscher JC; Ritz JP; Holmer C; Pohlen U; Buhr HJ
Zentralbl Chir; 2012 Apr; 137(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 22495487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills.
Hamilton EC; Scott DJ; Fleming JB; Rege RV; Laycock R; Bergen PC; Tesfay ST; Jones DB
Surg Endosc; 2002 Mar; 16(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 11928017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO.
Verdaasdonk EG; Stassen LP; Monteny LJ; Dankelman J
Surg Endosc; 2006 Mar; 20(3):511-8. PubMed ID: 16437275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contemporary virtual reality laparoscopy simulators: quicksand or solid grounds for assessing surgical trainees?
Thijssen AS; Schijven MP
Am J Surg; 2010 Apr; 199(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 20080227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic suturing on the FLS model possesses construct validity, is less physically demanding, and is favored by more surgeons compared with laparoscopy.
Stefanidis D; Hope WW; Scott DJ
Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2141-6. PubMed ID: 21184110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations.
Korndorffer JR; Clayton JL; Tesfay ST; Brunner WC; Sierra R; Dunne JB; Jones DB; Rege RV; Touchard CL; Scott DJ
J Surg Res; 2005 Sep; 128(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 15916767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of a virtual reality laparoscopic appendicectomy simulator: a novel process using cognitive task analysis.
Nayar SK; Musto L; Fernandes R; Bharathan R
Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Aug; 188(3):963-971. PubMed ID: 30456516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Construct, content and face validity of the camera handling trainer (CHT): a new E-BLUS training task for 30° laparoscope navigation skills.
Veneziano D; Minervini A; Beatty J; Fornara P; Gozen A; Greco F; Langenhuijsen JF; Lunelli L; Overgaauw D; Rassweiler J; Rocco B; Salas RS; Shariat S; Sweet RM; Simone G; Springer C; Tuccio A; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Weibl P; Cozzupoli P
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):479-84. PubMed ID: 26245746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator.
Sethi AS; Peine WJ; Mohammadi Y; Sundaram CP
J Endourol; 2009 Mar; 23(3):503-8. PubMed ID: 19265469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a novel basic virtual reality simulator, the LAP-X, for training basic laparoscopic skills.
Kawaguchi K; Egi H; Hattori M; Sawada H; Suzuki T; Ohdan H
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2014 Oct; 23(5):287-93. PubMed ID: 24773373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and transferability of a cost-effective laparoscopic camera navigation simulator.
Korndorffer JR; Hayes DJ; Dunne JB; Sierra R; Touchard CL; Markert RJ; Scott DJ
Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 15624054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Virtual reality simulators: valuable surgical skills trainers or video games?
Willis RE; Gomez PP; Ivatury SJ; Mitra HS; Van Sickle KR
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(3):426-33. PubMed ID: 24797861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of construct validity of a virtual reality laparoscopy simulator.
Rosenthal R; Gantert WA; Hamel C; Hahnloser D; Metzger J; Kocher T; Vogelbach P; Scheidegger D; Oertli D; Clavien PA
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2007 Aug; 17(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 17705717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
