These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17149748)

  • 1. Stem-cement porosity may explain early loosening of cemented femoral hip components: experimental-computational in vitro study.
    Mann KA; Damron LA; Miller MA; Race A; Clarke MT; Cleary RJ
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Mar; 25(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 17149748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vacuum-mixing cement does not decrease overall porosity in cemented femoral stems: an in vitro laboratory investigation.
    Messick KJ; Miller MA; Damron LA; Race A; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1115-21. PubMed ID: 17785755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cement-implant interface gaps explain the poor results of CMW3 for femoral stem fixation: A cadaver study of migration, fatigue and mantle morphology.
    Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Oct; 76(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 16263615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The significance of the micropores at the stem-cement interface in total hip replacement.
    Zhang H; Blunt L; Jiang X; Brown L; Barrans S
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2011; 22(7):845-56. PubMed ID: 21144164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical implications of interfacial defects between femoral hip implants and cement: a finite element analysis of interfacial gaps and interfacial porosity.
    Scheerlinck T; Broos J; Janssen D; Verdonschot N
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Oct; 222(7):1037-47. PubMed ID: 19024152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early cement damage around a femoral stem is concentrated at the cement/bone interface.
    Race A; Miller MA; Ayers DC; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2003 Apr; 36(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 12600339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of stem insertion rate on the porosity of the cement mantle of hip joint replacements.
    Baleani M; Fognani R; Toni A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12807160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Application of an amphiphilic bonder in a goat model to increase the femoral cement-bone adhesion in cemented hip arthroplasty].
    Müller-Rath R; Wirtz D; Andereya S; Gravius S; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Marx R; Mumme T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 17912668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative in vitro study on the long term performance of cemented hip stems: validation of a protocol to discriminate between "good" and "bad" designs.
    Cristofolini L; Teutonico AS; Monti L; Cappello A; Toni A
    J Biomech; 2003 Nov; 36(11):1603-15. PubMed ID: 14522201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The importance of a thick cement mantle depends on stem geometry and stem-cement interfacial bonding.
    Caruana J; Janssen D; Verdonschot N; Blunn GW
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Apr; 223(3):315-27. PubMed ID: 19405437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of stem-cement interfacial gaps: in vitro CT analysis of Charnley-Kerboul and Lubinus SPII femoral hip implants.
    Scheerlinck T; Vandenbussche P; Noble PC; Dunn JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Jan; 90(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 18160511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cement mantle stress under retroversion torque at heel-strike.
    Afsharpoya B; Barton DC; Fisher J; Purbach B; Wroblewski M; Stewart TD
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1323-30. PubMed ID: 19879794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Initial stability of cemented femoral stems as a function of surface finish, collar, and stem size.
    Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Buhari CF; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 14711952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional interface micromechanics of 11 en-bloc retrieved cemented femoral hip replacements.
    Mann KA; Miller MA; Verdonschot N; Izant TH; Race A
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Jun; 81(3):308-17. PubMed ID: 20367421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of preheating of hip prostheses on the stem-cement interface.
    Iesaka K; Jaffe WL; Kummer FJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Mar; 85(3):421-7. PubMed ID: 12637425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Challenges in relating experimental hip implant fixation predictions to clinical observations.
    Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 21040920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.