128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17150994)
1. Markers improve clustering of CGH data.
Liu J; Ranka S; Kahveci T
Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 17150994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distance-based clustering of CGH data.
Liu J; Mohammed J; Carter J; Ranka S; Kahveci T; Baudis M
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1971-8. PubMed ID: 16705014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accurate confidence aware clustering of array CGH tumor profiles.
van Houte BP; Heringa J
Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 26(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 19846437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Weighted clustering of called array CGH data.
Van Wieringen WN; Van De Wiel MA; Ylstra B
Biostatistics; 2008 Jul; 9(3):484-500. PubMed ID: 18156651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of self-organizing oscillator networks for use in clustering microarray data.
Salem SA; Jack LB; Nandi AK
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2008 Mar; 7(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 18334457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Small, fuzzy and interpretable gene expression based classifiers.
Vinterbo SA; Kim EY; Ohno-Machado L
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1964-70. PubMed ID: 15661797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Class discovery from gene expression data based on perturbation and cluster ensemble.
Yu Z; Wong HS
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2009 Jun; 8(2):147-60. PubMed ID: 19497836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Graph-based consensus clustering for class discovery from gene expression data.
Yu Z; Wong HS; Wang H
Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 23(21):2888-96. PubMed ID: 17872912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clustering threshold gradient descent regularization: with applications to microarray studies.
Ma S; Huang J
Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 17182700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clustering of change patterns using Fourier coefficients.
Kim J; Kim H
Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 18025003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Annotation-based distance measures for patient subgroup discovery in clinical microarray studies.
Lottaz C; Toedling J; Spang R
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2256-64. PubMed ID: 17586546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of array CGH data for cancer studies using fused quantile regression.
Li Y; Zhu J
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2470-6. PubMed ID: 17644559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of a Gibbs sampler method for model-based clustering of gene expression data.
Joshi A; Van de Peer Y; Michoel T
Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 18033794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of aberrant chromosomal regions from gene expression microarray studies applied to human breast cancer.
Buness A; Kuner R; Ruschhaupt M; Poustka A; Sültmann H; Tresch A
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2273-80. PubMed ID: 17599933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A segmentation/clustering model for the analysis of array CGH data.
Picard F; Robin S; Lebarbier E; Daudin JJ
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):758-66. PubMed ID: 17825008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Array comparative genomic hybridization copy number profiling: a new tool for translational research in solid malignancies.
Costa JL; Meijer G; Ylstra B; Caldas C
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2008 Apr; 18(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 18314064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A generalized clustering problem, with application to DNA microarrays.
Belitskaya-Levy I
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article2. PubMed ID: 16646866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computation of recurrent minimal genomic alterations from array-CGH data.
Rouveirol C; Stransky N; Hupé P; Rosa PL; Viara E; Barillot E; Radvanyi F
Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(7):849-56. PubMed ID: 16434445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Disease-specific genomic analysis: identifying the signature of pathologic biology.
Nicolau M; Tibshirani R; Børresen-Dale AL; Jeffrey SS
Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 23(8):957-65. PubMed ID: 17277331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recursive gene selection based on maximum margin criterion: a comparison with SVM-RFE.
Niijima S; Kuhara S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7():543. PubMed ID: 17187691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
