These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17151067)

  • 1. Monte Carlo simulations of occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology.
    Siiskonen T; Tapiovaara M; Kosunen A; Lehtinen M; Vartiainen E
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 80(954):460-8. PubMed ID: 17151067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology: simulations.
    Siiskonen T; Tapiovaara M; Kosunen A; Lehtinen M; Vartiainen E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):36-8. PubMed ID: 18283062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosemeter readings and effective dose to the cardiologist with protective clothing in a simulated interventional procedure.
    Schultz FW; Zoetelief J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):311-5. PubMed ID: 18388175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing doses to interventional radiologists using a personal dosimeter worn over a protective apron.
    Stranden E; Widmark A; Sekse T
    Acta Radiol; 2008 May; 49(4):415-8. PubMed ID: 18415785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Optimizing staff radiation protection in radiology by minimizing the effective dose].
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W; Luska G
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 16508835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating effective dose for a cardiac catheterisation procedure with single or double personal dosemeters.
    Schultz FW; Zoetelief J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 16517567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of various protective tools on the dose reduction in the eye lens in an interventional cardiology-clinical study.
    Domienik J; Bissinger A; Grabowicz W; Jankowski Ł; Kręcki R; Makowski M; Masiarek K; Plewka M; Lubiński A; Peruga JZ
    J Radiol Prot; 2016 Jun; 36(2):309-18. PubMed ID: 27183002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the occupational doses of interventional radiologists.
    Kuipers G; Velders XL; de Winter RJ; Reekers JA; Piek JJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 18266030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Types and arrangement of thyroid shields to reduce exposure of surgeons to ionizing radiation during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy.
    Lee SY; Min E; Bae J; Chung CY; Lee KM; Kwon SS; Park MS; Lee K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):2108-12. PubMed ID: 23963017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double-dosimetry algorithm for workers in interventional radiology.
    Clerinx P; Buls N; Bosmans H; de Mey J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18426849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Staff doses in interventional radiology: a national survey.
    Sánchez RM; Vano E; Fernández JM; Rosales F; Sotil J; Carrera F; García MA; Soler MM; Hernández-Armas J; Martínez LC; Verdú JF
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1496-501. PubMed ID: 22832138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.
    Fakhoury E; Provencher JA; Subramaniam R; Finlay DJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):246-250. PubMed ID: 30292602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of clinical occupational dose reduction effect of a new interventional cardiology shield for radial access combined with a scatter reducing drape.
    Gilligan P; Lynch J; Eder H; Maguire S; Fox E; Doyle B; Casserly I; McCann H; Foley D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 26154301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient.
    Musallam A; Volis I; Dadaev S; Abergel E; Soni A; Yalonetsky S; Kerner A; Roguin A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):1164-70. PubMed ID: 25510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
    Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Head and Neck Radiation Dose and Radiation Safety for Interventional Physicians.
    Fetterly K; Schueler B; Grams M; Sturchio G; Bell M; Gulati R
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(5):520-528. PubMed ID: 28279321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. X-Ray Protective Aprons Re-Evaluated.
    Eder H
    Rofo; 2023 Mar; 195(3):234-243. PubMed ID: 36796379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist.
    Marichal DA; Anwar T; Kirsch D; Clements J; Carlson L; Savage C; Rees CR
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 21354818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thyroid dose during neurointerventional procedures: does lead shielding reduce the dose?
    Shortt CP; Fanning NF; Malone L; Thornton J; Brennan P; Lee MJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(5):922-7. PubMed ID: 17533529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating head and neck tissue dose from x-ray scatter to physicians performing x-ray guided cardiovascular procedures: a phantom study.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA; Grams MP; Sturchio GM
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 27941226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.