490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17151660)
1. The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment.
Rockenbach B; Milinski M
Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7120):718-23. PubMed ID: 17151660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Indirect reciprocity provides only a narrow margin of efficiency for costly punishment.
Ohtsuki H; Iwasa Y; Nowak MA
Nature; 2009 Jan; 457(7225):79-82. PubMed ID: 19122640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem.
Panchanathan K; Boyd R
Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7016):499-502. PubMed ID: 15565153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity.
Ohtsuki H; Iwasa Y
J Theor Biol; 2006 Apr; 239(4):435-44. PubMed ID: 16174521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human cooperation based on punishment reputation.
dos Santos M; Rankin DJ; Wedekind C
Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2446-50. PubMed ID: 23888865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate.
Guala F
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 22289303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-person game facilitates indirect reciprocity under image scoring.
Suzuki S; Akiyama E
J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 17714735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The evolution of punishment through reputation.
dos Santos M; Rankin DJ; Wedekind C
Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Feb; 278(1704):371-7. PubMed ID: 20719773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolutionary game theory meets social science: is there a unifying rule for human cooperation?
Rosas A
J Theor Biol; 2010 May; 264(2):450-6. PubMed ID: 20167223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lab support for strong reciprocity is weak: punishing for reputation rather than cooperation.
Shaw A; Santos L
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):39. PubMed ID: 22289329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Global analyses of evolutionary dynamics and exhaustive search for social norms that maintain cooperation by reputation.
Ohtsuki H; Iwasa Y
J Theor Biol; 2007 Feb; 244(3):518-31. PubMed ID: 17030041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Third-party punishment as a costly signal of high continuation probabilities in repeated games.
Jordan JJ; Rand DG
J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 421():189-202. PubMed ID: 28390842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why people punish defectors. Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas.
Henrich J; Boyd R
J Theor Biol; 2001 Jan; 208(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 11162054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The punishment that sustains cooperation is often coordinated and costly.
Bowles S; Boyd R; Mathew S; Richerson PJ
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 22289309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare.
Boyd R; Gintis H; Bowles S
Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5978):617-20. PubMed ID: 20431013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Power and corruption.
Úbeda F; Duéñez-Guzmán EA
Evolution; 2011 Apr; 65(4):1127-39. PubMed ID: 21091468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Runaway selection for cooperation and strict-and-severe punishment.
Nakamaru M; Dieckmann U
J Theor Biol; 2009 Mar; 257(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18838079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How should we define goodness?--reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity.
Ohtsuki H; Iwasa Y
J Theor Biol; 2004 Nov; 231(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 15363933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The social structure of cooperation and punishment.
Gintis H; Fehr E
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 22289317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retaliation and the role for punishment in the evolution of cooperation.
Wolff I
J Theor Biol; 2012 Dec; 315():128-38. PubMed ID: 23017444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
