360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17151671)
1. Money matters.
Nat Med; 2006 Dec; 12(12):1331. PubMed ID: 17151671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomedical research funding in FY 2008.
Physiologist; 2007 Apr; 50(2):67-8. PubMed ID: 17477019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Show us the money.
Kennedy D
Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5805):1515. PubMed ID: 17158292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The NIH budget and the future of biomedical research.
Loscalzo J
N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(16):1665-7. PubMed ID: 16625006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research funding. Structural disequilibria in biomedical research.
Teitelbaum MS
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5889):644-5. PubMed ID: 18669847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. HIV/AIDS: money matters.
Roberts L; Jasny B
Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5888):511. PubMed ID: 18653875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
Zerhouni EA
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomedical funding. A bumpy landing for cancer research.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5660):936-7. PubMed ID: 14963292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Stat bite: NIH, NCI appropriations, 1997-2007.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):376. PubMed ID: 16537826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. U.S. budget. Amid the gloom, researchers prepare for a boom in funding.
Mervis J
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1274-5. PubMed ID: 19264988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NIH funding reform.
Strauss JF
Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5736):851. PubMed ID: 16081700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. NIH, related agencies face flat budget future.
Finkelstein JB
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):376-7. PubMed ID: 16537827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A lost generation.
Weinberg RA
Cell; 2006 Jul; 126(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 16839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microbiology. Détente declared on NIH biodefense funding.
Kaiser J
Science; 2005 May; 308(5724):938. PubMed ID: 15890854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Supporting the NIH before it is too late.
Liang TJ
Hepatology; 2006 Jul; 44(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16799988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. budget 2009. NIH hopes for more mileage from roadmap.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5864):716. PubMed ID: 18258872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
Max MB
J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Why aren't there more scientists advocating for funding?
Wells RD; Farnham P
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1081. PubMed ID: 17110554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Proposed changes to biomedical funding.
Dressler GR
Science; 2005 Nov; 310(5752):1279. PubMed ID: 16311319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
