212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17152439)
1. Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise.
Chang JE; Bai JY; Zeng FG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Dec; 53(12 Pt 2):2598-601. PubMed ID: 17152439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
Cullington HE; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
Zeng FG; Liu S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of cochlear implant processing and fundamental frequency on the intelligibility of competing sentences.
Stickney GS; Assmann PF; Chang J; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1069-78. PubMed ID: 17672654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sound-direction identification with bilateral cochlear implants.
Neuman AC; Haravon A; Sislian N; Waltzman SB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 17204900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of vowel recognition with cochlear implant simulations.
Liu C; Fu QJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17260858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
Kasturi K; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cantonese tone recognition with enhanced temporal periodicity cues.
Yuan M; Lee T; Yuen KC; Soli SD; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):327-37. PubMed ID: 19603889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Amos NE; Humes LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of noise and noise reduction processing on the operation of the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant processor.
Weiss MR
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 8263822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
