These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17153064)
1. Image fusion of computed tomographic and magnetic resonance images for the development of a three-dimensional musculoskeletal model of the equine forelimb. Zarucco L; Wisner ER; Swanstrom MD; Stover SM Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2006; 47(6):553-62. PubMed ID: 17153064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography of equine cheek teeth and adjacent structures: comparative study of image quality in horses in vivo, post-mortem and frozen-thawed. Röttiger C; Hellige M; Ohnesorge B; Bienert-Zeit A Acta Vet Scand; 2019 Dec; 61(1):62. PubMed ID: 31823831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and cross-sectional anatomic features of the manus in cadavers of dogs without forelimb disease. Ober CP; Freeman LE Am J Vet Res; 2009 Dec; 70(12):1450-8. PubMed ID: 19951115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of computed tomographic anatomy of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint. Vanderperren K; Ghaye B; Snaps FR; Saunders JH Am J Vet Res; 2008 May; 69(5):631-8. PubMed ID: 18447794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging of the palmar aspect of the equine podotrochlear apparatus: normal appearance. Busoni V; Snaps F; Trenteseaux J; Dondelinger RF Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2004; 45(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 15200255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CORRELATION OF ARTICULAR CARTILAGE THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS MADE WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, MAGNETIC RESONANCE ARTHROGRAPHY, AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ARTHROGRAPHY WITH GROSS ARTICULAR CARTILAGE THICKNESS IN THE EQUINE METACARPOPHALANGEAL JOINT. Porter EG; Winter MD; Sheppard BJ; Berry CR; Hernandez JA Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2016 Sep; 57(5):515-25. PubMed ID: 27478155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A technique for magnetic resonance imaging of equine cadaver specimens. Widmer WR; Buckwalter KA; Hill MA; Fessler JF; Ivancevich S Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1999; 40(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 10023989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of image quality and in vivo appearance of the normal equine nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses in computed tomography and high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging. Kaminsky J; Bienert-Zeit A; Hellige M; Rohn K; Ohnesorge B BMC Vet Res; 2016 Jan; 12():13. PubMed ID: 26786270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Construction of a Realistic, Whole-Body, Three-Dimensional Equine Skeletal Model using Computed Tomography Data. Lee AKK; Uhl EW; Osborn ML J Vis Exp; 2021 Feb; (168):. PubMed ID: 33720143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between anatomic features and low-field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint. Martinelli MJ; Baker GJ; Clarkson RB; Eurell JC; Pijanowski GJ; Kuriashkin IV; Carragher BO Am J Vet Res; 1996 Oct; 57(10):1421-6. PubMed ID: 8896677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of computed tomography angiography to evaluate the vascular anatomy of the distal portion of the forelimb of horses. Collins JN; Galuppo LD; Thomas HL; Wisner ER; Hornof WJ Am J Vet Res; 2004 Oct; 65(10):1409-20. PubMed ID: 15524329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The equine cervical spine: comparing MRI and contrast-enhanced CT images with anatomic slices in the sagittal, dorsal, and transverse plane. Sleutjens J; Cooley AJ; Sampson SN; Wijnberg ID; Back W; van der Kolk JH; Swiderski CE Vet Q; 2014; 34(2):74-84. PubMed ID: 25174534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the equine digit. Kleiter M; Kneissl S; Stanek C; Mayrhofer E; Baulain U; Deegen E Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1999; 40(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10023990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of computed tomographic three-dimensional reconstructions to develop instructional models for equine pelvic ultrasonography. Whitcomb MB; Doval J; Peters J Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(5):542-7. PubMed ID: 21699617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The appearance of the equine metacarpophalangeal region on high-field vs. standing low-field magnetic resonance imaging. Smith MA; Dyson SJ; Murray RC Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 21322388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and gross anatomy of forelimb joints in New Zealand rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.). Akgun RO; Orhan IO; Ekim O; Bumin A Anat Histol Embryol; 2023 Sep; 52(5):762-769. PubMed ID: 37254602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the equine musculoskeletal conditions. Tucker RL; Sande RD Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract; 2001 Apr; 17(1):145-57, vii. PubMed ID: 11488041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An innovative technique for displaying three dimensional radiographic anatomy of synovial structures in the equine distal limb. Smith AJ; Felstead CW; Lawson JS; Weller R Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2009; 50(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 19999341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Navigational ultrasound imaging: A novel imaging tool for aiding interventional therapies of equine musculoskeletal injuries. Lustgarten M; Redding WR; Schnabel LV; Prange T; Seiler GS Equine Vet J; 2016 Mar; 48(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 25640262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint: three-dimensional reconstruction and anatomic analysis. Martinelli MJ; Kuriashkin IV; Carragher BO; Clarkson RB; Baker GJ Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1997; 38(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 9238790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]