172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17153064)
1. Image fusion of computed tomographic and magnetic resonance images for the development of a three-dimensional musculoskeletal model of the equine forelimb.
Zarucco L; Wisner ER; Swanstrom MD; Stover SM
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2006; 47(6):553-62. PubMed ID: 17153064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography of equine cheek teeth and adjacent structures: comparative study of image quality in horses in vivo, post-mortem and frozen-thawed.
Röttiger C; Hellige M; Ohnesorge B; Bienert-Zeit A
Acta Vet Scand; 2019 Dec; 61(1):62. PubMed ID: 31823831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and cross-sectional anatomic features of the manus in cadavers of dogs without forelimb disease.
Ober CP; Freeman LE
Am J Vet Res; 2009 Dec; 70(12):1450-8. PubMed ID: 19951115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of computed tomographic anatomy of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint.
Vanderperren K; Ghaye B; Snaps FR; Saunders JH
Am J Vet Res; 2008 May; 69(5):631-8. PubMed ID: 18447794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging of the palmar aspect of the equine podotrochlear apparatus: normal appearance.
Busoni V; Snaps F; Trenteseaux J; Dondelinger RF
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2004; 45(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 15200255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CORRELATION OF ARTICULAR CARTILAGE THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS MADE WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, MAGNETIC RESONANCE ARTHROGRAPHY, AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ARTHROGRAPHY WITH GROSS ARTICULAR CARTILAGE THICKNESS IN THE EQUINE METACARPOPHALANGEAL JOINT.
Porter EG; Winter MD; Sheppard BJ; Berry CR; Hernandez JA
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2016 Sep; 57(5):515-25. PubMed ID: 27478155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A technique for magnetic resonance imaging of equine cadaver specimens.
Widmer WR; Buckwalter KA; Hill MA; Fessler JF; Ivancevich S
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1999; 40(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 10023989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of image quality and in vivo appearance of the normal equine nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses in computed tomography and high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging.
Kaminsky J; Bienert-Zeit A; Hellige M; Rohn K; Ohnesorge B
BMC Vet Res; 2016 Jan; 12():13. PubMed ID: 26786270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Construction of a Realistic, Whole-Body, Three-Dimensional Equine Skeletal Model using Computed Tomography Data.
Lee AKK; Uhl EW; Osborn ML
J Vis Exp; 2021 Feb; (168):. PubMed ID: 33720143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between anatomic features and low-field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint.
Martinelli MJ; Baker GJ; Clarkson RB; Eurell JC; Pijanowski GJ; Kuriashkin IV; Carragher BO
Am J Vet Res; 1996 Oct; 57(10):1421-6. PubMed ID: 8896677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of computed tomography angiography to evaluate the vascular anatomy of the distal portion of the forelimb of horses.
Collins JN; Galuppo LD; Thomas HL; Wisner ER; Hornof WJ
Am J Vet Res; 2004 Oct; 65(10):1409-20. PubMed ID: 15524329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The equine cervical spine: comparing MRI and contrast-enhanced CT images with anatomic slices in the sagittal, dorsal, and transverse plane.
Sleutjens J; Cooley AJ; Sampson SN; Wijnberg ID; Back W; van der Kolk JH; Swiderski CE
Vet Q; 2014; 34(2):74-84. PubMed ID: 25174534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the equine digit.
Kleiter M; Kneissl S; Stanek C; Mayrhofer E; Baulain U; Deegen E
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1999; 40(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10023990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of computed tomographic three-dimensional reconstructions to develop instructional models for equine pelvic ultrasonography.
Whitcomb MB; Doval J; Peters J
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(5):542-7. PubMed ID: 21699617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The appearance of the equine metacarpophalangeal region on high-field vs. standing low-field magnetic resonance imaging.
Smith MA; Dyson SJ; Murray RC
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 21322388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and gross anatomy of forelimb joints in New Zealand rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.).
Akgun RO; Orhan IO; Ekim O; Bumin A
Anat Histol Embryol; 2023 Sep; 52(5):762-769. PubMed ID: 37254602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the equine musculoskeletal conditions.
Tucker RL; Sande RD
Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract; 2001 Apr; 17(1):145-57, vii. PubMed ID: 11488041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An innovative technique for displaying three dimensional radiographic anatomy of synovial structures in the equine distal limb.
Smith AJ; Felstead CW; Lawson JS; Weller R
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2009; 50(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 19999341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Navigational ultrasound imaging: A novel imaging tool for aiding interventional therapies of equine musculoskeletal injuries.
Lustgarten M; Redding WR; Schnabel LV; Prange T; Seiler GS
Equine Vet J; 2016 Mar; 48(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 25640262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint: three-dimensional reconstruction and anatomic analysis.
Martinelli MJ; Kuriashkin IV; Carragher BO; Clarkson RB; Baker GJ
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1997; 38(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 9238790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
