These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17153083)
21. Reviewing for journals: ask not what your profession can do for you but what you can do for your profession. Steers WD J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1597. PubMed ID: 16600708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Researchers, authors and reviewers: what are our responsibilities? Kramer MS Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 26(4):308-9. PubMed ID: 22686381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned. Adam D; Knight J Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Consider the source. Mason DJ Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. In pursuit of a quality journal. Hanley KJ N Y State Dent J; 2014 Jan; 80(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 24654360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Response to open peer commentaries on "Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3Rs". Osborne NJ; Payne D; Newman ML Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):W3. PubMed ID: 20013483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Scientific reporting guidelines]. Nylenna M Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology: premium space! Gilchrest BA J Invest Dermatol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):2671. PubMed ID: 23187104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The ATS Journals' policy on image manipulation. Abraham E; Adler KB; Shapiro SD; Leff AR Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol; 2008 Nov; 39(5):499. PubMed ID: 18927351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [When the editor makes an error]. Hem E Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Oct; 128(20):2303. PubMed ID: 19096482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Perceived journal quality: an indicator of research quality. Fahy K; Fenwick J Women Birth; 2008 Sep; 21(3):97-8. PubMed ID: 18657498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. Davidoff F; DeAngelis CD; Drazen JM; Nicholls MG; Hoey J; Højgaard L; Horton R; Kotzin S; Nylenna M; Overbeke AJ; Sox HC; Van Der Weyden MB; Wilkes MS N Engl J Med; 2001 Sep; 345(11):825-6; discussion 826-7. PubMed ID: 11556304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Peer review: should we modify our process? Berquist TH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):463-4. PubMed ID: 24555581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for]. Thörn A Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(44):3458. PubMed ID: 15560663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]