These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17153185)

  • 1. Selective attention versus selection for action: negative priming is not the result of distractors being unattended.
    Joordens S; Betancourt I; Spalek TM
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Aug; 68(6):890-6. PubMed ID: 17153185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bigger than a breadbox? Attention to distractors may not enhance negative priming.
    Mackintosh B; Mathews A; Holden E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Dec; 28(6):1323-9. PubMed ID: 12542130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating a memory-based account of negative priming: support for selection-feature mismatch.
    MacDonald PA; Joordens S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1478-96. PubMed ID: 10946726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative priming effects that are bigger than a breadbox: attention to distractors does not eliminate negative priming, it enhances it.
    MacDonald PA; Joordens S; Seergobin KN
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Mar; 27(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 10226431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relevant distractors do not cause negative priming.
    Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Apr; 13(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 16893002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Negative priming, attention, and discriminating the present from the past.
    Milliken B; Rock A
    Conscious Cogn; 1997; 6(2-3):308-27. PubMed ID: 9262414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prime display offset modulates negative priming only for easy-selection tasks.
    Frings C; Wühr P
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Apr; 35(3):504-13. PubMed ID: 17691149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic priming effects from single words in a lexical decision task.
    Noguera C; Ortells JJ; Abad MJ; Carmona E; Daza MT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jun; 125(2):175-202. PubMed ID: 16950164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional demand and memory retrieval in negative priming.
    Chao HF; Yeh YY
    Psychol Res; 2008 May; 72(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 17206450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Negative priming of unattended part primes: implications for models of holistic and analytic processing in object recognition.
    Conlan LI; Phillips JC; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2289-97. PubMed ID: 19626574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased perceptual and conceptual processing difficulty makes the immeasurable measurable: negative priming in the absence of probe distractors.
    Frings C; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 21077720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flanker negative priming from spatially unpredictable primes: an ERP study.
    Gibbons H; Frings C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 20079389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: the role of selection difficulty.
    Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 7991353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual selective attention with virtual barriers.
    Schneider DW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1275-1281. PubMed ID: 28477312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective impairment of masked priming in dual-task performance.
    Fischer R; Kiesel A; Kunde W; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):572-95. PubMed ID: 20839135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus-based priming of task choice during voluntary task switching.
    Arrington CM; Weaver SM; Pauker RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1060-7. PubMed ID: 20565222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the robustness of prime response retrieval processes: evidence from auditory negative priming without probe interference.
    Mayr S; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):335-57. PubMed ID: 23799324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.