175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17153256)
1. [Health protection and embryo protection from an ethical-legal perspective. Report of the Bioethics Committee of Rheinland-Pfalz on the need to revise the embryo protection and stem cell laws].
Kress H
Ethik Med; 2006 Mar; 18(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 17153256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.
Priest JA
Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Human reproductive technologies and the law: a select committee report.
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee
Bull Med Ethics; 2005 May; (208):13-21. PubMed ID: 17115496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. President's Council on Bioethics: reproduction and responsibility.
Doerflinger RM
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 15452926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The politics of bioethics.
Cohen E; Kristol W
Hum Life Rev; 2004; 30(2):7-15. PubMed ID: 15540375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Human reproductive cloning: an analysis of the Andrews Report.
Little K
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2002 Jan; 21(1):S79-91. PubMed ID: 15828158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Principles of ethical decision making regarding embryonic stem cell research in Germany.
Heinemann T; Honnefelder L
Bioethics; 2002 Nov; 16(6):530-43. PubMed ID: 12472113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The ethics of human embryo experimentation.
Caton H
Linacre Q; 1987 Nov; 54(4):24-42. PubMed ID: 16127847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stem cell division: abortion law and its influence on the adoption of radically different embryonic stem cell legislation in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
Belew KL
Tex Int Law J; 2004; 39(3):479-519. PubMed ID: 16514771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reprogenetics and public policy. Reflections and recommendations.
Parens E; Knowles LP
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(4):S1-24. PubMed ID: 12971062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The progressive legal vulnerability of embryonic human life in Spain: the law 35/1988 to 14/2006 and law 14/2007].
Germán Zurriaráin R
Cuad Bioet; 2009; 20(69):155-81. PubMed ID: 19507920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. U.S. panel about to weigh in on rules for assisted fertility.
Hall SS
N Y Times Web; 2004 Mar; ():F1, F4. PubMed ID: 15250081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioethics and health law in New Zealand. Bioethics commentary.
Evans D
N Z Bioeth J; 2001 Feb; 2(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 15586982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Embryonic developments.
Gross M
Curr Biol; 2009 Jun; 19(11):R427-8. PubMed ID: 19522043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The 14/2006 law on human assisted reproduction techniques: scientific and ethical considerations].
Lacadena JR
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2006; (24):157-84. PubMed ID: 17124975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulating dangerous futures: the German Embryo Protection Act of 1990--legislation in risk society.
Augst C
Soc Leg Stud; 2000 Jun; 9(2):205-26. PubMed ID: 14628759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Placing a moratorium on research cloning to ensure effective control over reproductive cloning.
Capron AM
Hastings Law J; 2002 Jul; 53(5):1057-72. PubMed ID: 15508216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Supreme court of Canada decision on the assisted Human Reproduction Act creates urgent need for action.
Baylis F
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Apr; 33(4):317-9. PubMed ID: 21501535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Science policy and the law: reproductive and therapeutic cloning.
Knowles LP
N Y Univ J Legis Public Policy; 2000-2001; 4(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 15011709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pandora's progeny: ethical issues in assisted human reproduction.
Cameron NM
Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):745-79. PubMed ID: 16610155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
