183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17153375)
1. Point/Counterpoint. Film mammography for breast cancer screening in younger women is no longer appropriate because of the demonstrated superiority of digital mammography for this age group.
Yaffe MJ; Barnes GT; Orton CG
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):3979-82. PubMed ID: 17153375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital mammography: an update.
Schulz-Wendtland R; Fuchsjäger M; Wacker T; Hermann KP
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 19592186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.
Del Turco MR; Mantellini P; Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Martinelli F; Lazzari B; Houssami N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):860-6. PubMed ID: 17885057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical results of digital mammography].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Bautz W
Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15744483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.
Séradour B; Heid P; Estève J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 24370149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Current situation and future perspectives of digital mammography].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wacker T; Bautz W
Radiologe; 2008 Apr; 48(4):324-34. PubMed ID: 18335192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
Hambly NM; McNicholas MM; Phelan N; Hargaden GC; O'Doherty A; Flanagan FL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection.
Sala M; Comas M; Macià F; Martinez J; Casamitjana M; Castells X
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19420316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital mammography: coming of age.
Morin RL; Maidment AD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):798-801. PubMed ID: 17411931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation.
Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography. For the proposition.
Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):811-2. PubMed ID: 16696454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Higher mammography screening costs without appreciable clinical benefit: the case of digital mammography.
Kerlikowske K; Hubbard R; Tosteson AN
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Aug; 106(8):. PubMed ID: 25031310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography. Against the proposition.
Kallergi M
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):812-4. PubMed ID: 16696455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital mammography: what next?
Pisano ED
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):583-5. PubMed ID: 17412132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Point/Counterpoint. Cone beam x-ray CT will be superior to digital x-ray tomosynthesis in imaging the breast and delineating cancer.
Karellas A; Lo JY; Orton CG
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):409-11. PubMed ID: 18383660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A limitation of ACRIN DMIST.
Hixson GL; Hendrick RE; Pisano ED; Yaffe MJ; Gatsonis CA
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):702; author reply 702-3. PubMed ID: 18641261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Technology evaluation center assessment synopsis: full-field digital mammography.
Rothenberg BM; Ziegler KM; Aronson N
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):586-8. PubMed ID: 17412133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DMIST results: technologic or observer variability?
Kopans DB; Pisano ED; Acharyya S; Hendrick RE; Yaffe MJ; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett LW; Baum JK; Gatsonis CA
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):703; author reply 703. PubMed ID: 18641262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy among Women Screened in the Ontario Breast Screening Program--Evidence that Direct Radiography Is Superior to Computed Radiography for Cancer Detection.
Pisano ED
Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):311-2. PubMed ID: 26789598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
