130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17153408)
1. Routine testing of magnetic field homogeneity on clinical MRI systems.
Chen HH; Boykin RD; Clarke GD; Gao JH; Roby JW
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4299-306. PubMed ID: 17153408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. B
Gach HM; Curcuru AN; Mutic S; Kim T
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4101-4114. PubMed ID: 32472707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correction of MRI-induced geometric distortions in whole-body small animal PET-MRI.
Frohwein LJ; Hoerr V; Faber C; Schäfers KP
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3848-58. PubMed ID: 26133586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Continuous table acquisition MRI for radiotherapy treatment planning: distortion assessment with a new extended 3D volumetric phantom.
Walker A; Liney G; Holloway L; Dowling J; Rivest-Henault D; Metcalfe P
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1982-91. PubMed ID: 25832089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modified perturbation method for transverse electromagnetic (TEM) coil tuning and evaluation.
Avdievich NI; Krymov VN; Hetherington HP
Magn Reson Med; 2003 Jul; 50(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12815673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability and bias assessment in breast ADC measurement across multiple systems.
Keenan KE; Peskin AP; Wilmes LJ; Aliu SO; Jones EF; Li W; Kornak J; Newitt DC; Hylton NM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):846-55. PubMed ID: 27008431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of hardware-related geometrical distortion in structural MRI at 7 Tesla for image-guided applications in neurosurgery.
Dammann P; Kraff O; Wrede KH; Özkan N; Orzada S; Mueller OM; Sandalcioglu IE; Sure U; Gizewski ER; Ladd ME; Gasser T
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jul; 18(7):910-6. PubMed ID: 21549620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of EPID for leaf position accuracy QA of dynamic multi-leaf collimator (DMLC) treatment.
Chang J; Obcemea CH; Sillanpaa J; Mechalakos J; Burman C
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2091-6. PubMed ID: 15305462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of echo spacing and readout bandwidth on basic performances of EPI-fMRI acquisition sequences implemented on two 1.5 T MR scanner systems.
Giannelli M; Diciotti S; Tessa C; Mascalchi M
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):303-10. PubMed ID: 20175493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved volumetric measurement of brain structure with a distortion correction procedure using an ADNI phantom.
Maikusa N; Yamashita F; Tanaka K; Abe O; Kawaguchi A; Kabasawa H; Chiba S; Kasahara A; Kobayashi N; Yuasa T; Sato N; Matsuda H; Iwatsubo T;
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):062303. PubMed ID: 23718605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of a novel large field of view phantom and a software module for the quality assurance of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging.
Torfeh T; Hammoud R; McGarry M; Al-Hammadi N; Perkins G
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 33(7):939-49. PubMed ID: 25882440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics and quality assurance of a dedicated open 0.23 T MRI for radiation therapy simulation.
Mah D; Steckner M; Palacio E; Mitra R; Richardson T; Hanks GE
Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2541-7. PubMed ID: 12462720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of the onboard imaging unit for the first clinical magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy system.
Hu Y; Rankine L; Green OL; Kashani R; Li HH; Li H; Nana R; Rodriguez V; Santanam L; Shvartsman S; Victoria J; Wooten HO; Dempsey JF; Mutic S
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5828-37. PubMed ID: 26429257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of the MLC on the MRI field distortion of a prototype MRI-linac.
Kolling S; Oborn B; Keall P
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121705. PubMed ID: 24320491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of B
Curcuru AN; Lewis BC; Kim T; Yang D; Michael Gach H
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):2929-2938. PubMed ID: 33720421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic field distribution in the presence of paramagnetic plates in magnetic resonance imaging: a combined numerical and experimental study.
Mertens P; Machann J; Mueller-Bierl B; Steidle G; Bellemann ME; Schick F
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1777-84. PubMed ID: 18561652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Geometric distortion characterization and correction for the 1.0 T Australian MRI-linac system using an inverse electromagnetic method.
Shan S; Liney GP; Tang F; Li M; Wang Y; Ma H; Weber E; Walker A; Holloway L; Wang Q; Wang D; Liu F; Crozier S
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1126-1138. PubMed ID: 31856301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Porous phantoms for PET and SPECT performance evaluation and quality assurance.
DiFilippo FP; Price JP; Kelsch DN; Muzic RF
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1183-94. PubMed ID: 15191308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the validity of 3D polymer gel dosimetry: III. MRI-related error sources.
Vandecasteele J; De Deene Y
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jan; 58(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 23221352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A complete distortion correction for MR images: I. Gradient warp correction.
Doran SJ; Charles-Edwards L; Reinsberg SA; Leach MO
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(7):1343-61. PubMed ID: 15798328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
