127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17153718)
1. Effect of multichannel digital signal processing on loudness comfort, sentence recognition, and sound quality.
Mispagel KM; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2006; 17(10):681-707. PubMed ID: 17153718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance benefits for adults using a cochlear implant with adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a comparative study.
Müller-Deile J; Kiefer J; Wyss J; Nicolai J; Battmer R
Cochlear Implants Int; 2008 Mar; 9(1):8-26. PubMed ID: 18300224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.
Boymans M; Dreschler WA
Audiology; 2000; 39(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 11093610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of digital signal processing features on children's speech recognition and loudness perception.
Crukley J; Scollie SD
Am J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 23(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 24018572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF method for fitting hearing aids with multichannel amplitude compression.
Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):657-66. PubMed ID: 20526199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
Keidser G; Grant F
Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of a portable digital hearing aid with narrow-band loudness compensation.
Hidaka H; Kawase T; Takahashi S; Suzuki Y; Ozawa K; Sakamoto S; Sasaki N; Hirano K; Ueda N; Sone T; Takasaka T
Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 9832405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effect of a High Upper Input Limiting Level on Word Recognition in Noise, Sound Quality Preferences, and Subjective Ratings of Real-World Performance.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):547-62. PubMed ID: 26134722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
Smeds K
Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tolerable hearing aid delays. V. Estimation of limits for open canal fittings.
Stone MA; Moore BC; Meisenbacher K; Derleth RP
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):601-17. PubMed ID: 18469715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Improvement of hearing aid fitting with digital aids and new fitting strategies].
Schorn K; Baumann U
Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Jan; 78(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10080122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt).
Kiessling J; Schubert M; Archut A
Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 8881002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Control of hearing-aid saturated sound pressure level by frequency-shaped output compression limiting.
McDermott HJ; Dean MR; Dillon H
Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 10207954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A digital filterbank hearing aid: three digital signal processing algorithms--user preference and performance.
Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):373-87. PubMed ID: 9360861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
