These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17153820)

  • 1. Survey return rates as a function of priority versus first-class mailing.
    Brems C; Johnson ME; Warner T; Roberts LW
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 17153820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Del Valle ML; Morgenstern H; Rogstad TL; Albright C; Vickrey BG
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Dec; 20(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 10183331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing response rates for mailed surveys of Medicaid clients and other low-income populations.
    Gibson PJ; Koepsell TD; Diehr P; Hale C
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Jun; 149(11):1057-62. PubMed ID: 10355382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of two distribution methods on response rates to a patient safety questionnaire in nursing homes.
    Lapane KL; Quilliam BJ; Hughes CM
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Sep; 8(7):446-52. PubMed ID: 17845947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response rates to surveys with self-addressed, stamped envelopes versus a self-addressed label.
    Groves BW; Olsson RH
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1226-8. PubMed ID: 10932585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
    McMahon SR; Iwamoto M; Massoudi MS; Yusuf HR; Stevenson JM; David F; Chu SY; Pickering LK
    Pediatrics; 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. PubMed ID: 12671142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. E-mail versus conventional postal mail survey of geriatric chiefs.
    Raziano DB; Jayadevappa R; Valenzula D; Weiner M; Lavizzo-Mourey R
    Gerontologist; 2001 Dec; 41(6):799-804. PubMed ID: 11723348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survey methods and response rates among rural community dwelling older adults.
    Edelman LS; Yang R; Guymon M; Olson LM
    Nurs Res; 2013; 62(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 23817286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient requests and provider suggestions for alternative treatments as reported by rural and urban care providers.
    Brems C; Johnson ME; Warner TD; Roberts LW
    Complement Ther Med; 2006 Mar; 14(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 16473749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tone of postcards in increasing survey response rates.
    Price JH; Yingling F; Walsh E; Murnan J; Dake JA
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Apr; 94(2):444-8. PubMed ID: 15154170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring differences in caseloads of rural and urban healthcare providers in Alaska and New Mexico.
    Brems C; Johnson ME; Warner TD; Roberts LW
    Public Health; 2007 Jan; 121(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 17169386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects on response rates and costs of stamps vs business reply in a mail survey of physicians.
    Urban N; Anderson GL; Tseng A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 May; 46(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 8501471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.
    Beebe TJ; Locke GR; Barnes SA; Davern ME; Anderson KJ
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. PubMed ID: 17489911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
    Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey.
    Baron G; De Wals P; Milord F
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Mar; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Barriers to healthcare as reported by rural and urban interprofessional providers.
    Brems C; Johnson ME; Warner TD; Roberts LW
    J Interprof Care; 2006 Mar; 20(2):105-18. PubMed ID: 16608714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.
    Sneed RC; May WL; Stencel C
    Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e612-25. PubMed ID: 15520092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of various mailing strategies among nonrespondents in a prospective cohort study.
    Rimm EB; Stampfer MJ; Colditz GA; Giovannucci E; Willett WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jun; 131(6):1068-71. PubMed ID: 2343859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct mailing of faecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized population study from Central Italy.
    Giorgi Rossi P; Grazzini G; Anti M; Baiocchi D; Barca A; Bellardini P; Brezzi S; Camilloni L; Falini P; Maccallini V; Mantellini P; Romeo D; Rubeca T; Venditti MA
    J Med Screen; 2011; 18(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 22045820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.