BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17153977)

  • 1. Cervical microleakage in MOD restorations: in vitro comparison of indirect and direct composite.
    Duquia Rde C; Osinaga PW; Demarco FF; de V Habekost L; Conceição EN
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):682-7. PubMed ID: 17153977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
    Attar N; Korkmaz Y
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the cervical integrity during occlusal loading of Class II restorations.
    Campos PE; Barceleiro Mde O; Sampaio-Filho HR; Martins LR
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18335734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems.
    Cardoso PE; Placido E; Francci CE; Perdigão J
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 10850249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flowable composites as "filled adhesives:" a microleakage study.
    Sensi LG; Marson FC; Monteiro S; Baratieri LN; Caldeira de Andrada MA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):32-41. PubMed ID: 15558088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gingival microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts.
    El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Eltanty A; Abbasi K; Habib N
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 17555183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restoration microleakage.
    Wagner WC; Aksu MN; Neme AM; Linger JB; Pink FE; Walker S
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 18335736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of seven adhesive systems in enamel and dentin.
    Silveira de Araújo C; Incerti da Silva T; Ogliari FA; Meireles SS; Piva E; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):26-33. PubMed ID: 17091137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents.
    Alavi AA; Kianimanesh N
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11817466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of photoactivation systems and resin composites on the microleakage of esthetic restorations.
    Cavalcante LM; Peris AR; Ambrosano GM; Ritter AV; Pimenta LA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 17277829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II cavities of various resin composites.
    Civelek A; Ersoy M; L'Hotelier E; Soyman M; Say EC
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 14531612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.