378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17154246)
1. A simulation study of odds ratio estimation for binary outcomes from cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3415-28. PubMed ID: 17154246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the risk difference, risk ratio and odds ratio scales for quantifying the unadjusted intervention effect in cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC; Forbes AB; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5143-55. PubMed ID: 18613226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-parametric bootstrap confidence intervals for the intraclass correlation coefficient.
Ukoumunne OC; Davison AC; Gulliford MC; Chinn S
Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3805-21. PubMed ID: 14673940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.
Flynn TN; Peters TJ
BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Baseline adjustments for binary data in repeated cross-sectional cluster randomized trials.
Nixon RM; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2673-92. PubMed ID: 12939779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of statistical methods for analysis of clustered binary observations.
Heo M; Leon AC
Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):911-23. PubMed ID: 15558576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian methods for analysis of binary outcome data in cluster randomized trials on the absolute risk scale.
Thompson SG; Warn DE; Turner RM
Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(3):389-410. PubMed ID: 14748035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of methods to analyse continuous data from pseudo cluster randomized trials.
Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; Melis RJ; Borm GF
Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4100-15. PubMed ID: 17328006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multilevel analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
Kim HY; Preisser JS; Rozier RG; Valiyaparambil JV
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 34(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16856945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of odds ratio or relative risk to measure a treatment effect in clinical trials with multiple correlated binary outcomes: data from the NINDS t-PA stroke trial.
Lu M; Tilley BC;
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1891-901. PubMed ID: 11427947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of a mixed effects logistic regression model for binary outcomes with unequal cluster size.
Heo M; Leon AC
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):513-26. PubMed ID: 15920895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cluster randomized trials produced similar results to individually randomized trials in a meta-analysis of enhanced care for depression.
Gilbody S; Bower P; Torgerson D; Richards D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):160-168. PubMed ID: 18177789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.
Baskerville NB; Hogg W; Lemelin J
J Fam Pract; 2001 Mar; 50(3):W241-6. PubMed ID: 11252223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Small-sample performance of the robust score test and its modifications in generalized estimating equations.
Guo X; Pan W; Connett JE; Hannan PJ; French SA
Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3479-95. PubMed ID: 15977302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
