681 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17154509)
1. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.
Huang N; Shoichet BK; Irwin JJ
J Med Chem; 2006 Nov; 49(23):6789-801. PubMed ID: 17154509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ligand- and structure-based virtual screening on the DUD data set.
von Korff M; Freyss J; Sander T
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Feb; 49(2):209-31. PubMed ID: 19434824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking.
Mysinger MM; Carchia M; Irwin JJ; Shoichet BK
J Med Chem; 2012 Jul; 55(14):6582-94. PubMed ID: 22716043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Community benchmarks for virtual screening.
Irwin JJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2008; 22(3-4):193-9. PubMed ID: 18273555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening.
Ferrari AM; Wei BQ; Costantino L; Shoichet BK
J Med Chem; 2004 Oct; 47(21):5076-84. PubMed ID: 15456251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.
Halgren TA; Murphy RB; Friesner RA; Beard HS; Frye LL; Pollard WT; Banks JL
J Med Chem; 2004 Mar; 47(7):1750-9. PubMed ID: 15027866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multi-conformer ensemble docking to difficult protein targets.
Ellingson SR; Miao Y; Baudry J; Smith JC
J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):1026-34. PubMed ID: 25198248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bridging chemical and biological space: "target fishing" using 2D and 3D molecular descriptors.
Nettles JH; Jenkins JL; Bender A; Deng Z; Davies JW; Glick M
J Med Chem; 2006 Nov; 49(23):6802-10. PubMed ID: 17154510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fast structure-based virtual ligand screening combining FRED, DOCK, and Surflex.
Miteva MA; Lee WH; Montes MO; Villoutreix BO
J Med Chem; 2005 Sep; 48(19):6012-22. PubMed ID: 16162004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Virtual decoy sets for molecular docking benchmarks.
Wallach I; Lilien R
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 21207928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ligand and decoy sets for docking to G protein-coupled receptors.
Gatica EA; Cavasotto CN
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22168315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FieldScreen: virtual screening using molecular fields. Application to the DUD data set.
Cheeseright TJ; Mackey MD; Melville JL; Vinter JG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2108-17. PubMed ID: 18991371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes.
McGovern SL; Shoichet BK
J Med Chem; 2003 Jul; 46(14):2895-907. PubMed ID: 12825931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Property-Unmatched Decoys in Docking Benchmarks.
Stein RM; Yang Y; Balius TE; O'Meara MJ; Lyu J; Young J; Tang K; Shoichet BK; Irwin JJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Feb; 61(2):699-714. PubMed ID: 33494610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine.
Jain AN
J Med Chem; 2003 Feb; 46(4):499-511. PubMed ID: 12570372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of scaffold hopping efficiency by use of molecular interaction fingerprints.
Venhorst J; Núñez S; Terpstra JW; Kruse CG
J Med Chem; 2008 Jun; 51(11):3222-9. PubMed ID: 18447336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations.
Bissantz C; Folkers G; Rognan D
J Med Chem; 2000 Dec; 43(25):4759-67. PubMed ID: 11123984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple active site corrections for docking and virtual screening.
Vigers GP; Rizzi JP
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 14695822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ligity: A Non-Superpositional, Knowledge-Based Approach to Virtual Screening.
Ebejer JP; Finn PW; Wong WK; Deane CM; Morris GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2600-2616. PubMed ID: 31117509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DecoyFinder: an easy-to-use python GUI application for building target-specific decoy sets.
Cereto-Massagué A; Guasch L; Valls C; Mulero M; Pujadas G; Garcia-Vallvé S
Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(12):1661-2. PubMed ID: 22539671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
