137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17154698)
1. Radio-translucent 3-axis mechanical testing rig for the spine in micro-CT.
Si-Hoe KM; Teoh SH; Teo J
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Dec; 128(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 17154698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between CT intensity, micro-architecture and mechanical properties of porcine vertebral cancellous bone.
Teo JC; Si-Hoe KM; Keh JE; Teoh SH
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Mar; 21(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 16356612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress distribution in the intervertebral disc correlates with strength distribution in subdiscal trabecular bone in the porcine lumbar spine.
Ryan G; Pandit A; Apatsidis D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Aug; 23(7):859-69. PubMed ID: 18423954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Loading simulation of lumbar spine vertebrae during a compression test using the finite elements method and trabecular bone strength properties, determined by means of nanoindentations.
Bouzakis KD; Mitsi S; Michailidis N; Mirisidis I; Mesomeris G; Maliaris G; Korlos A; Kapetanos G; Antonarakos P; Anagnostidis K
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2004 Jun; 4(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 15615116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical response of the lumbar spine in dynamic compression.
Duma SM; Kemper AR; McNeely DM; Brolinson PG; Matsuoka F
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2006; 42():476-81. PubMed ID: 16817654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture patterns of the adolescent porcine spine: an experimental loading study in bending-compression.
Baranto A; Ekström L; Hellström M; Lundin O; Holm S; Swärd L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 15626985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time-lapsed microstructural imaging of bone failure behavior.
Nazarian A; Müller R
J Biomech; 2004 Jan; 37(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 14672568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationships between densitometric and morphological parameters as measured by peripheral computed tomography and the compressive behavior of lumbar vertebral bodies from macaques (Macaca fascicularis).
Dickerson CR; Saha S; Hotchkiss CE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 18277866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of vertebral strength under loading conditions occurring in activities of daily living using a computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method.
Matsumoto T; Ohnishi I; Bessho M; Imai K; Ohashi S; Nakamura K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(14):1464-9. PubMed ID: 19525837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An MRI-based method to align the compressive loading axis for human cadaveric knees.
Martin KJ; Neu CP; Hull ML
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):855-62. PubMed ID: 18067389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A continuous pure moment loading apparatus for biomechanical testing of multi-segment spine specimens.
Lysack JT; Dickey JP; Dumas GA; Yen D
J Biomech; 2000 Jun; 33(6):765-70. PubMed ID: 10807999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The immediate effect of repeated loading on the compressive strength of young porcine lumbar spine.
Thoreson O; Baranto A; Ekström L; Holm S; Hellström M; Swärd L
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2010 May; 18(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 20012017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strain distribution in the lumbar vertebrae under different loading configurations.
Cristofolini L; Brandolini N; Danesi V; Juszczyk MM; Erani P; Viceconti M
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1281-92. PubMed ID: 23958297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How healthy discs herniate: a biomechanical and microstructural study investigating the combined effects of compression rate and flexion.
Wade KR; Robertson PA; Thambyah A; Broom ND
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):1018-28. PubMed ID: 24503692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fatigue failure in shear loading of porcine lumbar spine segments.
van Dieën JH; van der Veen A; van Royen BJ; Kingma I
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):E494-8. PubMed ID: 16816749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thoracolumbar spine mechanics contrasted under compression and shear loading.
Frei H; Oxland TR; Nolte LP
J Orthop Res; 2002 Nov; 20(6):1333-8. PubMed ID: 12472249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design and validation of a novel Cartesian biomechanical testing system with coordinated 6DOF real-time load control: application to the lumbar spine (L1-S, L4-L5).
Kelly BP; Bennett CR
J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1948-54. PubMed ID: 23764173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Full-field strain distribution in multi-vertebra spine segments: An in vitro application of digital image correlation.
Palanca M; Marco M; Ruspi ML; Cristofolini L
Med Eng Phys; 2018 Feb; 52():76-83. PubMed ID: 29229402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Restoring geometric and loading alignment of the thoracic spine with a vertebral compression fracture: effects of balloon (bone tamp) inflation and spinal extension.
Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Phillips FM; Magovern B; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Zindrick MR; Hadjipavlou AG; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 15653084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
