243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17154770)
1. Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment.
Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):207-22. PubMed ID: 17154770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determinants of the benefit for consistent stimulus-response mappings in dual-task performance of four-choice tasks.
Proctor RW; Vu KP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):734-56. PubMed ID: 19429956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determinants of the benefit for consistent spatial mappings in dual-task performance of three-choice tasks.
Proctor RW; Vu KP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1771-81. PubMed ID: 19933561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
Proctor RW; Vu KP
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Naïve and experienced judgments of stimulus-response compatibility: implications for interface design.
Vu KP; Proctor RW
Ergonomics; 2003 Jan; 46(1-3):169-87. PubMed ID: 12554405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects.
Vu KP; Proctor RW
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 15204140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of three helmet-mounted display symbologies on unusual attitude recognition and recovery.
Ercoline WR; Self BP; Matthews RS
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1053-8. PubMed ID: 12433226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Task-defined associations are mode specific for selection of relevant dimension but mode independent for selection of location mapping.
Proctor RW; Vu KP
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):370-91. PubMed ID: 18609411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks.
Fischer R; Plessow F; Kunde W; Kiesel A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1576-94. PubMed ID: 20718574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Head-up displays: effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance.
Ververs PM; Wickens CD
Int J Aviat Psychol; 1998; 8(4):377-403. PubMed ID: 11542276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unmixing the mixing cost: contributions from dimensional relevance and stimulus-response suppression.
Marí-Beffa P; Cooper S; Houghton G
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):478-88. PubMed ID: 22060145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reversed effects of spatial compatibility in natural scenes.
Müsseler J; Aschersleben G; Arning K; Proctor RW
Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(3):325-36. PubMed ID: 19827702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of bias on visuospatial and verbal compatibility effects in mixed-mapping environments.
Vu KP; Proctor RW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2594-605. PubMed ID: 21887599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implicit task sets in task switching?
Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonstrategic contributions to putatively strategic effects in selective attention tasks.
Risko EF; Blais C; Stolz JA; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 18665744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Working memory costs of task switching.
Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dimensional overlap accounts for independence and integration of stimulus-response compatibility effects.
Liu X; Park Y; Gu X; Fan J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1710-20. PubMed ID: 20675812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
