These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17154784)

  • 1. When does visual attention select all features of a distractor?
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1452-64. PubMed ID: 17154784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective attention and the perception of an attended nontarget object.
    Chen Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Dec; 31(6):1493-509. PubMed ID: 16366804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Capacity limits for face processing.
    Bindemann M; Burton AM; Jenkins R
    Cognition; 2005 Dec; 98(2):177-97. PubMed ID: 16307958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response selection in visual search: the influence of response compatibility of nontargets.
    Starreveld PA; Theeuwes J; Mortier K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):56-78. PubMed ID: 14769068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects?
    Ellis R; Tucker M; Symes E; Vainio L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):670-91. PubMed ID: 17563229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interference from multi-dimensional objects during feature and conjunction discriminations.
    Fournier LR; Bowd C; Herbert RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):191-209. PubMed ID: 10718070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention?
    Munneke J; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18589391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.
    Olivers CN; Meijer F; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1243-65. PubMed ID: 17002535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory attentional capture: effects of singleton distractor sounds.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 14769076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Top-down attentional control for distractor locations: the benefit of precuing distractor locations on target localization and discrimination.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):303-16. PubMed ID: 20364920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs?
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):764-87. PubMed ID: 17683227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects.
    Wühr P; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 18248132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tracking an object through feature space.
    Blaser E; Pylyshyn ZW; Holcombe AO
    Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6809):196-9. PubMed ID: 11089972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Look here but ignore what you see: effects of distractors at fixation.
    Beck DM; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):592-607. PubMed ID: 15982133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time course of similarity effects in visual search.
    Guest D; Lamberts K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1667-88. PubMed ID: 22004196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling.
    Nordfang M; Dyrholm M; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):510-35. PubMed ID: 22889161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.
    Shore DI; Barnes ME; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 16213655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional capture by a salient distractor in visual search: the effect of target-distractor similarity.
    Poiese P; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):233-6. PubMed ID: 19071990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the fate of distractor representations.
    Frings C; Wentura D; Wühr P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):570-5. PubMed ID: 22428679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.