These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17156149)

  • 1. Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System): results of the first human clinical trial ("PACE study").
    Eickhoff A; van Dam J; Jakobs R; Kudis V; Hartmann D; Damian U; Weickert U; Schilling D; Riemann JF
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 17156149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical considerations and patient comfort in total colonoscopy with and without a transparent cap: initial experiences from a pilot study.
    Dafnis GM
    Endoscopy; 2000 May; 32(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 10817176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of forces exerted by a new computer-assisted colonoscope (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System).
    Eickhoff A; Jakobs R; Kamal A; Mermash S; Riemann JF; van Dam J
    Endoscopy; 2006 Dec; 38(12):1224-9. PubMed ID: 17163323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CathCam guide wire-directed colonoscopy: first pilot study in patients with a previous incomplete colonoscopy.
    Fritscher-Ravens A; Fox S; Swain CP; Milla P; Long G
    Endoscopy; 2006 Mar; 38(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16528644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers.
    Shah SG; Saunders BP; Brooker JC; Williams CB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Jul; 52(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10882954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes.
    Lee DW; Li AC; Ko CW; Chu DW; Chan KC; Poon CM; Sin KS; Leung KF; Sze TS; Chan AC; Chung SC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Mar; 65(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 17321243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quo vadis: another new colonoscope.
    Waye JD
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):267-8. PubMed ID: 17311648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers.
    Rösch T; Adler A; Pohl H; Wettschureck E; Koch M; Wiedenmann B; Hoepffner N
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1139-46. PubMed ID: 18355823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique for difficult colonoscopy.
    May A; Nachbar L; Ell C
    Endoscopy; 2006 Apr; 38(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 16680641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double-balloon colonoscopy after failed conventional colonoscopy: a pilot series with a new instrument.
    Gay G; Delvaux M
    Endoscopy; 2007 Sep; 39(9):788-92. PubMed ID: 17703387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is PillCam COLON capsule endoscopy ready for colorectal cancer screening? A prospective feasibility study in a community gastroenterology practice.
    Sieg A; Friedrich K; Sieg U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 104(4):848-54. PubMed ID: 19240710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
    Rex DK; Chadalawada V; Helper DJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Sep; 98(9):2000-5. PubMed ID: 14499778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responsive insertion technology.
    Saito Y; Kimura H
    Dig Endosc; 2011 May; 23 Suppl 1():164-7. PubMed ID: 21535226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the variable-stiffness paediatric colonoscope more effective than a standard adult colonoscope for outpatient adult colonoscopy? A randomised controlled trial.
    Al-Shurieki SH; Marshall JB
    Dig Liver Dis; 2005 Sep; 37(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 15916930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial bowel markers: a novel method for measuring the accuracy of colonoscopy.
    Beckly JB; Douie WJ; Hayward CM; Oppong CF; Coleman MG; Beckly DE; Hosie KB
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jul; 50(7):1047-52. PubMed ID: 17279301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.
    Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insertability and safety of a shape-locking device for colonoscopy.
    Rex DK; Khashab M; Raju GS; Pasricha J; Kozarek R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Apr; 100(4):817-20. PubMed ID: 15784024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Third Eye retrograde auxiliary imaging system during colonoscopy.
    Triadafilopoulos G; Li J
    Endoscopy; 2008 Jun; 40(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 18543136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates.
    Deenadayalu VP; Chadalawada V; Rex DK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 99(11):2138-42. PubMed ID: 15554993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.