These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17156284)

  • 1. Shrunken p-values for assessing differential expression with applications to genomic data analysis.
    Ghosh D
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1099-106. PubMed ID: 17156284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrete nonparametric algorithms for outlier detection with genomic data.
    Ghosh D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 20309754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A moment-based method for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and its application to microarray gene expression data.
    Lai Y
    Biostatistics; 2007 Oct; 8(4):744-55. PubMed ID: 17244594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple-testing strategy for analyzing cDNA array data on gene expression.
    Delongchamp RR; Bowyer JF; Chen JJ; Kodell RL
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):774-82. PubMed ID: 15339301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A decision-theory approach to interpretable set analysis for high-dimensional data.
    Boca SM; Bravo HC; Caffo B; Leek JT; Parmigiani G
    Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):614-23. PubMed ID: 23909925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parametric and nonparametric FDR estimation revisited.
    Wu B; Guan Z; Zhao H
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):735-44. PubMed ID: 16984315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shrinkage estimation of effect sizes as an alternative to hypothesis testing followed by estimation in high-dimensional biology: applications to differential gene expression.
    Montazeri Z; Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article23. PubMed ID: 20597849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the prediction error difference between 2 predictors.
    van de Wiel MA; Berkhof J; van Wieringen WN
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jul; 10(3):550-60. PubMed ID: 19380517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian decision procedure for testing multiple hypotheses in DNA microarray experiments.
    Gómez-Villegas MA; Salazar I; Sanz L
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2014 Feb; 13(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24317791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonparametric inference for local extrema with application to oligonucleotide microarray data in yeast genome.
    Song PX; Gao X; Liu R; Le W
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):545-54. PubMed ID: 16918919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the null distribution to adjust observed confidence levels for genome-scale screening.
    Bickel DR
    Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):363-70. PubMed ID: 20880014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A temporal hidden Markov regression model for the analysis of gene regulatory networks.
    Gupta M; Qu P; Ibrahim JG
    Biostatistics; 2007 Oct; 8(4):805-20. PubMed ID: 17400597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sources of variation in false discovery rate estimation include sample size, correlation, and inherent differences between groups.
    Zhang J; Coombes KR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 13(Suppl 13):S1. PubMed ID: 23320794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. False discovery rate estimation for large-scale homogeneous discrete p-values.
    Liang K
    Biometrics; 2016 Jun; 72(2):639-48. PubMed ID: 26492596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation on performance of Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) for the comparisons of several treatments with one control in the presence of small-variance genes.
    Lin D; Shkedy Z; Burzykowski T; Ion R; Göhlmann HW; Bondt AD; Perer T; Geerts T; Van den Wyngaert I; Bijnens L
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):801-23. PubMed ID: 18932139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A unified approach for simultaneous gene clustering and differential expression identification.
    Yuan M; Kendziorski C
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1089-98. PubMed ID: 17156283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mixture modelling of gene expression data from microarray experiments.
    Ghosh D; Chinnaiyan AM
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Feb; 18(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 11847075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systems biology approach for identifying novel pathway regulators in eQTL mapping.
    Li S; Lu Q; Cui Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):373-400. PubMed ID: 20309764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The clustering of regression models method with applications in gene expression data.
    Qin LX; Self SG
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):526-33. PubMed ID: 16918917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian neural networks for bivariate binary data: an application to prostate cancer study.
    Chakraborty S; Ghosh M; Maiti T; Tewari A
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3645-62. PubMed ID: 16138362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.