276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17156441)
1. Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility?
Ruiz-Herrera A; Castresana J; Robinson TJ
Genome Biol; 2006; 7(12):R115. PubMed ID: 17156441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gene synteny comparisons between different vertebrates provide new insights into breakage and fusion events during mammalian karyotype evolution.
Kemkemer C; Kohn M; Cooper DN; Froenicke L; Högel J; Hameister H; Kehrer-Sawatzki H
BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Apr; 9():84. PubMed ID: 19393055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the role of tandem repeats in shaping the genomic architecture of great apes.
Farré M; Bosch M; López-Giráldez F; Ponsà M; Ruiz-Herrera A
PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27239. PubMed ID: 22076140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chromosomal instability in Afrotheria: fragile sites, evolutionary breakpoints and phylogenetic inference from genome sequence assemblies.
Ruiz-Herrera A; Robinson TJ
BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Oct; 7():199. PubMed ID: 17958882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of chicken chromosome 28 provides new clues to the evolutionary fragility of gene-rich vertebrate regions.
Gordon L; Yang S; Tran-Gyamfi M; Baggott D; Christensen M; Hamilton A; Crooijmans R; Groenen M; Lucas S; Ovcharenko I; Stubbs L
Genome Res; 2007 Nov; 17(11):1603-13. PubMed ID: 17921355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative genomics reveals birth and death of fragile regions in mammalian evolution.
Alekseyev MA; Pevzner PA
Genome Biol; 2010; 11(11):R117. PubMed ID: 21118492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evolutionary conserved chromosomal segments in the human karyotype are bounded by unstable chromosome bands.
Ruiz-Herrera A; García F; Mora L; Egozcue J; Ponsà M; Garcia M
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2005; 108(1-3):161-74. PubMed ID: 15545726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recurring genomic breaks in independent lineages support genomic fragility.
Hinsch H; Hannenhalli S
BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Nov; 6():90. PubMed ID: 17090315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fragile regions and not functional constraints predominate in shaping gene organization in the genus Drosophila.
von Grotthuss M; Ashburner M; Ranz JM
Genome Res; 2010 Aug; 20(8):1084-96. PubMed ID: 20601587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A high resolution map of mammalian X chromosome fragile regions assessed by large-scale comparative genomics.
Prada CF; Laissue P
Mamm Genome; 2014 Dec; 25(11-12):618-35. PubMed ID: 25086724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Divergence of the polytene chromosome banding sequences as a reflection of evolutionary rearrangements of the genome linear structure].
Gunderina LI; Kiknadze II; Istomina AG; Gusev VD; Miroshnichenko LA
Genetika; 2005 Feb; 41(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 15810608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-resolution comparative mapping among man, cattle and mouse suggests a role for repeat sequences in mammalian genome evolution.
Schibler L; Roig A; Mahe MF; Laurent P; Hayes H; Rodolphe F; Cribiu EP
BMC Genomics; 2006 Aug; 7():194. PubMed ID: 16882342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expression and identification of folate-sensitive fragile sites in British Suffolk sheep (Ovis aries).
Ali A; Abdullah M; Babar ME; Javed K; Nadeem A
J Genet; 2008 Dec; 87(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 19147906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cartographic study: breakpoints in 1574 families carrying human reciprocal translocations.
Cohen O; Cans C; Cuillel M; Gilardi JL; Roth H; Mermet MA; Jalbert P; Demongeot J
Hum Genet; 1996 May; 97(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 8655149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of FRA7B, a human common fragile site mapped at the 7p chromosome terminal region.
Bosco N; Pelliccia F; Rocchi A
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2010 Oct; 202(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 20804921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evolutionary conservation of fragile sites induced by 5-azacytidine and 5-azadeoxycytidine in man, gorilla, and chimpanzee.
Schmid M; Ott G; Haaf T; Scheres JM
Hum Genet; 1985; 71(4):342-50. PubMed ID: 4077049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution versus constitution: differences in chromosomal inversion.
Schmidt S; Claussen U; Liehr T; Weise A
Hum Genet; 2005 Jul; 117(2-3):213-9. PubMed ID: 15886998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Common fragile sites in man and three closely related primate species.
Smeets DF; van de Klundert FA
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1990; 53(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 2323227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A genome-wide analysis of common fragile sites: what features determine chromosomal instability in the human genome?
Fungtammasan A; Walsh E; Chiaromonte F; Eckert KA; Makova KD
Genome Res; 2012 Jun; 22(6):993-1005. PubMed ID: 22456607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No statistical association between common fragile sites and nonrandom chromosome breakpoints in cancer cells.
Sutherland GR; Simmers RN
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 1988 Mar; 31(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 3162194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
