These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17158084)

  • 1. Biomechanical study of a prosthetic solution based on an angled abutment: case of upper lateral incisor.
    Dubois G; Daas M; Bonnet AS; Lipinski P
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Nov; 29(9):989-98. PubMed ID: 17158084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
    Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A screwless and cementless technique for the restoration of single-tooth implants: a retrospective cohort study.
    Urdaneta RA; Marincola M; Weed M; Chuang SK
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):562-71. PubMed ID: 18761575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method.
    Lin CL; Chang SH; Chang WJ; Kuo YC
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Oct; 115(5):408-16. PubMed ID: 17850430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
    Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture strength and failure mode of five different single-tooth implant-abutment combinations.
    Strub JR; Gerds T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 12737249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale?
    Maeda Y; Miura J; Taki I; Sogo M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 17608737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.