These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17159728)
21. Duplicate publication Part 1. Consideration of the issues. Davidhizar R; Newman Giger J Nurse Author Ed; 2002; 12(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12092429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina, Pannonica et Adriatica and scientific misconduct. Poljak M Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat; 2009 Sep; 18(3):91-3. PubMed ID: 19784521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime? Redman BK; Merz JF Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Plagiarism is dishonest and can easily be exposed]. Schroeder TV Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Sep; 167(37):3479. PubMed ID: 16159453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Fabrication, falsification and plagiarism. Martyn C QJM; 2003 Apr; 96(4):243-4. PubMed ID: 12651968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions]. Maisonneuve H Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors. Gollogly L; Momen H Rev Saude Publica; 2006 Aug; 40 Spec no.():24-9. PubMed ID: 16924299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Publication of a review article in "Ginekologia Polska" identified as a plagiarism from the "British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology]. Poreba R Ginekol Pol; 1998 Jul; 69(7):561. PubMed ID: 9867475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Two situations, which are difficult to differentiate from each other: plagiarism and duplication]. Kıraç FS Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2011 Aug; 11(5):459-60. PubMed ID: 21733788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Report from the Scientific Integrity Advisor: issues arising in 2005 and 2006. Daroff RB Neurology; 2007 May; 68(21):1841-2. PubMed ID: 17515547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The gray zone: scientific misconduct comes in many shades. Handelsman J DNA Cell Biol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 18279120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism. Wittmaack K Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]