142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17160113)
1. [Elective single embryo transfer in assisted reproduction].
Romundstad LB; Sunde A; Kjøtrød S; Stoum H; Kierulf KH; Lippe B; Wold A; von Düring V
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Nov; 126(23):3098-100. PubMed ID: 17160113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Elective single embryo transfer in assisted reproduction].
Ertzeid G; Fedorcsak P; Abyholm T; Tanbo T
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Nov; 126(23):3101-2. PubMed ID: 17160114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten.
Tiitinen A; Hydén-Granskog C; Gissler M
Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2439-41. PubMed ID: 15319392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single embryo transfer in clinical practice.
Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2004 Sep; 7(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 15590571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the Spanish Fertility Society guidelines on the number of embryos to transfer.
Cabello Y; Gómez-Palomares JL; Castilla JA; Hernández J; Marqueta J; Pareja A; Luceño F; Hernández E; Coroleu B
Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 20888295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Elective single embryo transfer: a justified policy for selected patients].
Giorgetti C; Chabert-Orsini V; Barry B; Chinchole JM; Franquebalme JP; Hans E; Glowaczower E; Terriou P; Sitri MC; Salzmann J; Thibault MC; Roulier R
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Apr; 34(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 16603403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elective transfer of single fresh blastocysts and later transfer of cryostored blastocysts reduces the twin pregnancy rate and can improve the in vitro fertilization live birth rate in younger women.
Henman M; Catt JW; Wood T; Bowman MC; de Boer KA; Jansen RP
Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1620-7. PubMed ID: 16359955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Working to eliminate multiple pregnancies: a success story in Québec.
Bissonnette F; Phillips SJ; Gunby J; Holzer H; Mahutte N; St-Michel P; Kadoch IJ
Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Oct; 23(4):500-4. PubMed ID: 21840757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Single-embryo transfer: Rennes' Hospital experience].
Le Lannou D; Laurent MC; Griveau JF; Véron E; Jaffré F; Jouve G; Gueho A; Morcel K
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Nov; 36(11):1158-61. PubMed ID: 18849181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on day 3.
El-Toukhy T; Kamal A; Wharf E; Grace J; Bolton V; Khalaf Y; Braude P
Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2642-8. PubMed ID: 19567414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The 2004 Italian legislation regulating assisted reproduction technology: a multicentre survey on the results of IVF cycles.
Ragni G; Allegra A; Anserini P; Causio F; Ferraretti AP; Greco E; Palermo R; Somigliana E
Hum Reprod; 2005 Aug; 20(8):2224-8. PubMed ID: 15817586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [How to improve ART results? Is France behind other countries? Strategy for single embryo transfer: The value of embryo selection and embryo freezing].
Terriou P; Giorgetti C; Hans E; Salzmann J; Charles O; Cignetti L; Avon C; Roulier R
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Sep; 34(9):786-92. PubMed ID: 16950642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years.
Veleva Z; Vilska S; Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2098-102. PubMed ID: 16740524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of legislation on outcomes of assisted reproduction technology: lessons from the 2004 Italian law.
La Sala GB; Villani MT; Nicoli A; Valli B; Iannotti F; Blickstein I
Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 17681340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing multiple pregnancy in assisted reproduction technology: towards a policy of single blastocyst transfer in younger women.
Kalu E; Thum MY; Abdalla H
BJOG; 2008 Aug; 115(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 18518874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States.
Jain T; Missmer SA; Hornstein MD
N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(16):1639-45. PubMed ID: 15084696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.
Stern JE; Cedars MI; Jain T; Klein NA; Beaird CM; Grainger DA; Gibbons WE;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17445805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing the number of cleavage stage embryos to transfer on day 3 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Surrey ES; Racowsky C;
Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 18321489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frozen-thawed transfer cycles: are they comparable with fresh?
Mocanu EV; Cottell E; Waite K; Hennelly B; Collins C; Harrison RF
Ir Med J; 2008 Jun; 101(6):181-4. PubMed ID: 18700513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
