These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17160983)

  • 21. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women.
    Baudouin JY; Tiberghien G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Nov; 117(3):313-32. PubMed ID: 15500809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attractiveness of men's faces in relation to women's phase of menstrual cycle.
    Danel D; Pawlowski B
    Coll Antropol; 2006 Jun; 30(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 16848141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differences in visual perception of age and attractiveness of female facial and body skin.
    Fink B; Matts PJ; Röder S; Johnson R; Burquest M
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2011 Apr; 33(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 20807261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex.
    Ishai A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Feb; 63(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 16759727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preferences for masculinity in male bodies change across the menstrual cycle.
    Little AC; Jones BC; Burriss RP
    Horm Behav; 2007 May; 51(5):633-9. PubMed ID: 17466990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Unger L; Little AC; Feinberg DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1420-30. PubMed ID: 18085954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attractiveness, distinctiveness, and recognition of faces: attractive faces can be typical or distinctive but are not better recognized.
    Wickham LH; Morris PE
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(3):455-68. PubMed ID: 14503395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The ideal of facial beauty: a review.
    Hönn M; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jan; 68(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 17238049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Eye-mouth-eye angle as a good indicator of face masculinization, asymmetry, and attractiveness (Homo sapiens).
    Danel D; Pawlowski B
    J Comp Psychol; 2007 May; 121(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 17516801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: a New Zealand-U.S. comparative study.
    Dixson BJ; Dixson AF; Bishop PJ; Parish A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Jun; 39(3):798-806. PubMed ID: 19139985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visualizing facial shape regression upon 2nd to 4th digit ratio and testosterone.
    Schaefer K; Fink B; Mitteroecker P; Neave N; Bookstein FL
    Coll Antropol; 2005 Dec; 29(2):415-9. PubMed ID: 16417137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Smith FG; Little AC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):751-8. PubMed ID: 20515201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Oral contraceptive use in women changes preferences for male facial masculinity and is associated with partner facial masculinity.
    Little AC; Burriss RP; Petrie M; Jones BC; Roberts SC
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2013 Sep; 38(9):1777-85. PubMed ID: 23528282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of leg-to-body ratio (LBR) on judgments of female physical attractiveness: assessments of computer-generated images varying in LBR.
    Frederick DA; Hadji-Michael M; Furnham A; Swami V
    Body Image; 2010 Jan; 7(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 19822462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sex difference in attractiveness perceptions of strong and weak male walkers.
    Fink B; André S; Mines JS; Weege B; Shackelford TK; Butovskaya ML
    Am J Hum Biol; 2016 Nov; 28(6):913-917. PubMed ID: 27387424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.
    Li NP; Bailey JM; Kenrick DT; Linsenmeier JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(6):947-55. PubMed ID: 12051582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does attractiveness in men provide clues to semen quality?
    Peters M; Rhodes G; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Mar; 21(2):572-9. PubMed ID: 18179518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle.
    Little AC; Jones BC; Burt DM; Perrett DI
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Oct; 76(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 17919806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials.
    Werheid K; Schacht A; Sommer W
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Sep; 76(1-2):100-8. PubMed ID: 17681418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.