108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17162170)
1. Mid-term results of Exeter vs Endurance cemented stems.
Sherfey JJ; McCalden RW
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Dec; 21(8):1118-23. PubMed ID: 17162170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
Behairy YM; Harris WH
Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The long-term results of the original Exeter polished cemented femoral component: a follow-up report.
Ling RS; Charity J; Lee AJ; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):511-7. PubMed ID: 19282139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cemented collarless (Exeter-CPT) versus cementless collarless (PCA) femoral components. A 2- to 14-year follow-up evaluation.
Weidenhielm LR; Mikhail WE; Nelissen RG; Bauer TW
J Arthroplasty; 1995 Oct; 10(5):592-7. PubMed ID: 9273368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Good survival of uncemented tapered stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy: a mean 16 year follow-up study in 45 patients.
Parsch D; Jung AW; Thomsen M; Ewerbeck V; Aldinger PR
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Oct; 128(10):1081-5. PubMed ID: 17876593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cement-in-cement femoral revisions using a specially designed polished short revision stem; 24 consecutive stems followed for five to seven years.
te Stroet MA; Moret-Wever SG; de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
Hip Int; 2014; 24(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 24970322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of the MS-30 cemented femoral stem.
Morscher EW; Berli B; Clauss M; Grappiolo G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 16105497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration].
Landor I; Vavrík P; Jahoda D; Pokorný D; Ballay R; Sosna A
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip].
Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Hydroxyapatite-coated stems in total hip arthroplasty after a minimum 10-years follow-up.
Gallo J; Landor I; Cechová I; Jahoda D
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Oct; 75(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 19026187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flattened press-fit acetabular component in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a prospective study on 416 hips with 6-10 years follow-up.
Zwartelé RE; Olsthoorn PG; Pöll RG; Brand R; Doets HC
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1379-86. PubMed ID: 18758793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between triple-tapered and double-tapered cemented femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study comparing the C-Stem versus the Exeter Universal early results after 5 years of clinical experience.
Ek ET; Choong PF
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jan; 20(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 15660066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impaction grafting for femoral component revision using a non-polished bead-blasted chrome cobalt stem-average 8 1/2-year follow-up.
Krupp RJ; Malkani AL; Crawford CH; Capello WN; Feinberg JR; Baker D
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Dec; 21(8):1180-6. PubMed ID: 17162179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: a choice for all seasons.
Hamilton WG; Cashen DV; Ho H; Hopper RH; Engh CA
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4 Suppl 1):106-10. PubMed ID: 17570290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prosthesis survival after total hip arthroplasty--does surgical approach matter? Analysis of 19,304 Charnley and 6,002 Exeter primary total hip arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
Arthursson AJ; Furnes O; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Söreide JA
Acta Orthop; 2007 Dec; 78(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 18236177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Modified Exeter technique in revision hip surgery].
de Thomasson E; Guingand O; Terracher R; Mazel C
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 18555861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
