These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17162515)

  • 1. Consumer opinions of a stance control knee orthosis.
    Bernhardt KA; Irby SE; Kaufman KR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Dec; 30(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 17162515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gait changes over time in stance control orthosis users.
    Irby SE; Bernhardt KA; Kaufman KR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Dec; 31(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 17852777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stance control orthosis trial in patients with inclusion body myositis.
    Bernhardt K; Oh T; Kaufman K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Mar; 35(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 21515888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gait of stance control orthosis users: the dynamic knee brace system.
    Irby SE; Bernhardt KA; Kaufman KR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Dec; 29(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 16466156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateral ankle sprain alters postural control in bipedal stance: part 2 sensorial and mechanical effects induced by wearing an ankle orthosis.
    Genthon N; Bouvat E; Banihachemi JJ; Bergeau J; Abdellaoui A; Rougier PR
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2010 Apr; 20(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 19422660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Engineering design review of stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthoses.
    Yakimovich T; Lemaire ED; Kofman J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 19533539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Angular-velocity control approach for stance-control orthoses.
    Lemaire ED; Goudreau L; Yakimovich T; Kofman J
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2009 Oct; 17(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 19497821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and walking ability of KAFO users with the C-Brace
    Pröbsting E; Kannenberg A; Zacharias B
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Feb; 41(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 27151648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Craig-Scott orthosis: a biochemical and functional evaluation.
    Lehmann JF; Warren CG; Hertling D; McGee M; Simons BC; Dralle A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1976 Sep; 57(9):438-42. PubMed ID: 986799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance specification for lower limb orthotic devices.
    Johnson GR; Ferrarin M; Harrington M; Hermens H; Jonkers I; Mak P; Stallard J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2004 Aug; 19(7):711-8. PubMed ID: 15288457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Basic problems in the treatment with functional knee orthoses].
    Grifka J; Jutka H
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1994; 132(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 8048259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A quasi-passive compliant stance control Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis.
    Shamaei K; Napolitano PC; Dollar AM
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650471. PubMed ID: 24187288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis improves balance, risk of falling, mobility, function, and quality of life of individuals dependent on a knee-ankle-foot orthosis for ambulation.
    Ruetz A; DiBello T; Toelle C; Hemmen B; Wening J; Weber E; Braatz F; Winkler T; Steinfeldt F; Umari M; Rupp R; Kluge S; Krebs A; Wurdeman SR
    Disabil Rehabil; 2024 Aug; 46(17):4019-4032. PubMed ID: 37752724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of dynamic orthoses on gait: a retrospective control study in children with hemiplegia.
    Van Gestel L; Molenaers G; Huenaerts C; Seyler J; Desloovere K
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2008 Jan; 50(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 18173633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic bracing: elastics for patients with cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy and myelodysplasia.
    Nuzzo RM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980 May; (148):263-73. PubMed ID: 7379405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
    Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
    Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How accurate are lockable orthotic knee braces? An objective gait analysis study.
    Khan WS; Jones RK; Nokes L; Johnson DS
    Knee; 2007 Dec; 14(6):497-9. PubMed ID: 17766123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduction in head and intervertebral motion provided by 7 contemporary cervical orthoses in 45 individuals.
    Schneider AM; Hipp JA; Nguyen L; Reitman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):E1-6. PubMed ID: 17202874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dynamics of postural sway cannot be captured using a one-segment inverted pendulum model: a PCA on segment rotations during unperturbed stance.
    Pinter IJ; van Swigchem R; van Soest AJ; Rozendaal LA
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 100(6):3197-208. PubMed ID: 18829852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of a subject-specific amount of lateral wedge on knee mechanics in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis.
    Butler RJ; Marchesi S; Royer T; Davis IS
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Sep; 25(9):1121-7. PubMed ID: 17469197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.