265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17163493)
1. Physician-patient encounters: the structure of performance in family and general office practice.
Wenghofer EF; Williams AP; Klass DJ; Faulkner D
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2006; 26(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 17163493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician peer assessments for compliance with methadone maintenance treatment guidelines.
Strike C; Wenghofer E; Gnam W; Hillier W; Veldhuizen S; Millson M
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2007; 27(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 18085599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Five-year results of the peer assessment program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.
McAuley RG; Paul WM; Morrison GH; Beckett RF; Goldsmith CH
CMAJ; 1990 Dec; 143(11):1193-9. PubMed ID: 2224696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Results of the peer assessment program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.
McAuley RG; Henderson HW
Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Sep; 131(6):557-61. PubMed ID: 6478338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance assessment. Family physicians in Montreal meet the mark!
Goulet F; Jacques A; Gagnon R; Bourbeau D; Laberge D; Melanson J; Ménard C; Racette P; Rivest R
Can Fam Physician; 2002 Aug; 48():1337-44. PubMed ID: 12228963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What factors affect quality of care? Using the Peer Assessment Program in Ontario family practices.
Norton PG; Dunn EV; Soberman L
Can Fam Physician; 1997 Oct; 43():1739-44. PubMed ID: 9356754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A practical assessment of physician biopsychosocial performance.
Margalit AP; Glick SM; Benbassat J; Cohen A; Margolis CZ
Med Teach; 2007 Oct; 29(8):e219-26. PubMed ID: 17943605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of an enhanced peer assessment program: introducing education into regulatory assessment.
Wenghofer EF; Way D; Moxam RS; Wu H; Faulkner D; Klass DJ
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2006; 26(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 16986145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defensible assessment of the competency of the practicing physician.
Cunnington JP; Hanna E; Turnhbull J; Kaigas TB; Norman GR
Acad Med; 1997 Jan; 72(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 9008561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How do physicians assess their family physician colleagues' performance?: creating a rubric to inform assessment and feedback.
Sargeant J; Macleod T; Sinclair D; Power M
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2011; 31(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 21671274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review.
Hall W; Violato C; Lewkonia R; Lockyer J; Fidler H; Toews J; Jennett P; Donoff M; Moores D
CMAJ; 1999 Jul; 161(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 10420867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of family physicians' performance using patient charts: interrater reliability and concordance with chart-stimulated recall interview.
Goulet F; Jacques A; Gagnon R; Racette P; Sieber W
Eval Health Prof; 2007 Dec; 30(4):376-92. PubMed ID: 17986671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of the Kodak DT-60 physician's office analyzer as measured by CLIA-88 proposed evaluation criteria. Assessment of demographic and quality assurance factors influencing performance.
Meier S; Ehrmeyer S; Laessig R; Woodlief G; Lanphear B; Hassemer D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 May; 116(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 1580758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A longitudinal study of performance of physicians' office practices: data from the Peer Assessment Program in Ontario, Canada.
Norton PG; Faulkner D
Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1999 May; 25(5):252-8. PubMed ID: 10340209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Consultation competence in general practice: testing the reliability of the Leicester assessment package.
Fraser RC; McKinley RK; Mulholland H
Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Jul; 44(384):293-6. PubMed ID: 8068374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attributing sources of variation in patients' experiences of ambulatory care.
Rodriguez HP; Scoggins JF; von Glahn T; Zaslavsky AM; Safran DG
Med Care; 2009 Aug; 47(8):835-41. PubMed ID: 19584765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Educational interventions to improve practice of nonspecialty physicians who are identified in need by peer review.
Norton PG; Ginsburg LS; Dunn E; Beckett R; Faulkner D
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2004; 24(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 15709564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Better medical office safety culture is not associated with better scores on quality measures.
Hagopian B; Singer ME; Curry-Smith AC; Nottingham K; Hickner J
J Patient Saf; 2012 Mar; 8(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 22190123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and acceptance of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise as a performance assessment of practicing physicians.
Sidhu RS; Hatala R; Barron S; Broudo M; Pachev G; Page G
Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10 Suppl):S113-5. PubMed ID: 19907370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiologic interpretation by family physicians in an office practice setting.
Bergus GR; Franken EA; Koch TJ; Smith WL; Evans ER; Berbaum KS
J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 7561708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
